Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Getting Stronger While Cutting

dr_skier

New member
Lets take bob for example. Bob is doing cardio on a reduced calorie diet. Bob is looking to drop some bf%. But, Bob is still lifting weights and training hard 4-5x per week. Bob is still taking in his 300-350grams of protein (whey for half that) each day with carbs after lifting of course. Is it possible that bob will still get stonger and harder without gaining size?
 
A natural athlete on a reduced calorie diet will normally drop strength. I have done this 12 times, and only twice have really held strength. I was using tons of supplements, really loaded on Beverlys Muscle Synergy.

I believe much of it was sheer force of will also, because ironically each time I held strength, after the contest was over and I startted to eat more calories, I got weaker than pre show, and took a bit to get back to there even on pretty drastically increased calories.

This was just my experience, and all natural every time. (It may be worth mentioning here that I would never take in half of my protein in whey, diet is hard enough and whole foods are needed)
 
dr_skier said:
Lets take bob for example. Bob is doing cardio on a reduced calorie diet. Bob is looking to drop some bf%. But, Bob is still lifting weights and training hard 4-5x per week. Bob is still taking in his 300-350grams of protein (whey for half that) each day with carbs after lifting of course. Is it possible that bob will still get stonger and harder without gaining size?

Anything is possible "Bob", but realistically you have not given much more about BoB's stats or diet that can be used. Is Bob 400lbs. taking in 350grams of protein, or is Bob 150lbs. taking in 350gr of protein?

Keep in mind, whey protein converts to glucose at a 50-54% rate if the body needs it, so taking in a lot of whey is not always beneficial.
 
Sorry mr.x, bob is 265ish 6'4'' 13%bf. Bob is me. I just want to know if while i'm doing a bunch of cardio, restricting cals, using clen and other thermos, if my lifts can still get stronger because i'm still getting my protein content in as well as my post workout nutrition. Why should strength just be determined by an excess of cals?
 
dr_skier said:
Sorry mr.x, bob is 265ish 6'4'' 13%bf. Bob is me. I just want to know if while i'm doing a bunch of cardio, restricting cals, using clen and other thermos, if my lifts can still get stronger because i'm still getting my protein content in as well as my post workout nutrition. Why should strength just be determined by an excess of cals?

Caloric deficits, cardio and thermogenics are not a good formula to get stronger; however, if you train heavy and keep your protein intake up, you should keep your regular strength level -5-10%.
 
Mr.X said:
Anything is possible "Bob", but realistically you have not given much more about BoB's stats or diet that can be used. Is Bob 400lbs. taking in 350grams of protein, or is Bob 150lbs. taking in 350gr of protein?

Keep in mind, whey protein converts to glucose at a 50-54% rate if the body needs it, so taking in a lot of whey is not always beneficial.

Two questions:

1) Does whey convert to glucose at that rate while in a calorie surplus? Or only a deficit?

2) What rate would the body convert whole food protein to glucose in a calorie deficit?
 
36drew said:
Two questions:

1) Does whey convert to glucose at that rate while in a calorie surplus? Or only a deficit?

2) What rate would the body convert whole food protein to glucose in a calorie deficit?

This is broad but should answer both questions...exact numbers are hard to give due to the content of meals, etc.

Protein can act both as an energy source and as a nutrient... the proportion burnt to meet energy needs is increased when protein is in excess or when food is limited.

Which means simply that take in too much protein(caloric surplus), and excess can be converted, and take in too little energy nutrients and protein can and will be converted. The body is smart, and will utilize protein as needed.

****I wanted to edit this to add to simply remember, glucose is not only needed by the muscles, but liver and brain. The brain gets first dibs.
 
Last edited:
Lifterforlife said:
This is broad but should answer both questions...exact numbers are hard to give due to the content of meals, etc.

Protein can act both as an energy source and as a nutrient... the proportion burnt to meet energy needs is increased when protein is in excess or when food is limited.

Which means simply that take in too much protein(caloric surplus), and excess can be converted, and take in too little energy nutrients and protein can and will be converted. The body is smart, and will utilize protein as needed.

****I wanted to edit this to add to simply remember, glucose is not only needed by the muscles, but liver and brain. The brain gets first dibs.

Right, but would the body (under deficit conditions) opt for burning stored fat over liquid protein?
 
Sorry I forgot to get to this question...was looking over old questions I answered before and found this one. Hope this answers your question and makes sense.

Amino acid oxidation rates vary substantially when food intake is restricted, as they are then markedly influenced by the availability of other fuels, i.e., glucose, free fatty acids and ketone bodies (FLATT and BLACKBURN, 1976). This reflects the fact that maintenance of ATP levels takes priority in all cells, so that any available substrates will be used to regenerate ATP from ADP and phosphate.

I assume by liquid protein you mean injested protein of any kind? The body will use whatever nutrients are availale and the easiest. This is why it is imparitive to get 1.5 gr. of protein per lb. of bodyweight on a reduced calorie diet consisting of high protein/low carbs.

When only protein is consumed, nitrogen balances are less negative than during total food deprivation. Nitrogen balance can be approached even while the energy balance remains markedly negative, but substantially higher protein intakes are required. This situation is commonly encountered during a 'protein-sparing modified fast', where, after one week of adaptation, a dose of 1.5 g protein/kg body weight/d is generally sufficient to maintain nitrogen balance (LINDNER and BLACKBURN, 1976).
 
It normally take approximately 2 weeks on a keto style diet for instance to "teach" the body to mobilize FFA's for energy use. This is from Cahill 1970, and still holds true.

During prolonged starvation, mobilization of endogenous fat reserves can yield enough substrates to meet almost all of the body's energy needs, thanks to the production of ketone bodies by the liver which can be used by the brain instead of glucose. However, about two weeks of starvation elapse before circulating ketone body levels rise enough for the combined availability of FFA, ß-hydroxy-butyrate and acetoacetate to allow maximal curtailment of amino acid oxidation.
 
Top Bottom