circusgirl
New member
I've just joined the weightlifting club at the uni I work in, and I'm not sure what to do next. They are not keen on Westside-style training, y'see, they want me to do progressive overload instead. They say Westside methods are "super hardcore, way too advanced" for a relative newbie like me, and I should instead concentrate on progressive overload with one day for squats + accessory work for the legs, 1 for deadlifts plus back work, and one for bench.
The plus points of this club are -
- access to a special gym in the sports centre that is for the exclusive use of the weightlifting club. Which has about 25 members, and oodles of nice equipment, proper bars, power rack, rubberised plates etc.
- intensive one-to-one coaching on form and execution of the lifts, encouragement, matching up with a training partner etc.
- They do know quite a bit, they have won the British Universities Powerlifting championships many times.
Minus points, or point -
- lack of interest in "that Louie Simmons stuff". I have made substantial gains using Westside methods, my body has not become overtrained. I started out with 60kg (132lbs) for an arched back bent leg good morning, 2 months later I'm at 90kg (198lbs). (I'm getting good at mental arithmetic, especially multiplying and dividing by 2.2 by posting to this site
). This is pretty good going, donchathink? My bench is not doing so well, but, it's ok. OTOH, my gains could just be beginner's luck. Thoughts folks?
They think I should definitely not be doing singles and triples, but should do a "standard bodybuilding type split" instead for the moment. They said though, that if I want to go back to Westside methods in January, I could.
They are not used to new members having the faintest idea what they are doing. They liked my deadlift a great deal - and I've improved greatly on this lift WITHOUT doing heavy single DLs every week. Instead I've been doing speed deads and heavy GMs instead.
I agree the form on my squat is a bit off. They think box squats are "dangerous" though and don't think much of using your glutes/hams to squat. Thing is, I KNOW when I recruit the hips with sitting back, wide stance the lift is a MILLION times easier.
They also go for conventinoal benching with the shoulders wide. Does this lead to shoulder injuries?
I think I will go with their split to begin with. Then after 2 months I'll start to incorporate things like GMs into my routine, and some speed work. Hopefully they will be convinced....
How do you guys deal with a situation like this? Don't want to alienate the coach too much. Does the above idea sound like a gradual way of bringing in Westside ideas? I KNOW you guys place nationally and elite, that the Westside methods work for you, but am I really biting off more than I can chew by using these methods from the beginning?
The plus points of this club are -
- access to a special gym in the sports centre that is for the exclusive use of the weightlifting club. Which has about 25 members, and oodles of nice equipment, proper bars, power rack, rubberised plates etc.
- intensive one-to-one coaching on form and execution of the lifts, encouragement, matching up with a training partner etc.
- They do know quite a bit, they have won the British Universities Powerlifting championships many times.
Minus points, or point -
- lack of interest in "that Louie Simmons stuff". I have made substantial gains using Westside methods, my body has not become overtrained. I started out with 60kg (132lbs) for an arched back bent leg good morning, 2 months later I'm at 90kg (198lbs). (I'm getting good at mental arithmetic, especially multiplying and dividing by 2.2 by posting to this site
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"
They think I should definitely not be doing singles and triples, but should do a "standard bodybuilding type split" instead for the moment. They said though, that if I want to go back to Westside methods in January, I could.
They are not used to new members having the faintest idea what they are doing. They liked my deadlift a great deal - and I've improved greatly on this lift WITHOUT doing heavy single DLs every week. Instead I've been doing speed deads and heavy GMs instead.
I agree the form on my squat is a bit off. They think box squats are "dangerous" though and don't think much of using your glutes/hams to squat. Thing is, I KNOW when I recruit the hips with sitting back, wide stance the lift is a MILLION times easier.
They also go for conventinoal benching with the shoulders wide. Does this lead to shoulder injuries?
I think I will go with their split to begin with. Then after 2 months I'll start to incorporate things like GMs into my routine, and some speed work. Hopefully they will be convinced....
How do you guys deal with a situation like this? Don't want to alienate the coach too much. Does the above idea sound like a gradual way of bringing in Westside ideas? I KNOW you guys place nationally and elite, that the Westside methods work for you, but am I really biting off more than I can chew by using these methods from the beginning?