b fold-you said that you would "fall apart" if someone told you you had to train twice in one day, correct?No one is telling you you have to train twice in one day.If you don't want to train, you can quit and go be a potato farmer in Idaho if you want, but no one can tell you how to train.The gist of this post is basically to define the pros and cons of training twice in one day.It's asking the advice of those people that have given this type of training a fair trial.It's great that you have stated your opinion.I've read alot of your suggestions and advice on this board, and 99% of it(in my humble opinion) is right on.But, if you haven't tried this type of training, how can you justify speaking negatively about it?If you have tried it, then I would like to see the routine(exercises,sets,reps,frequency) you used.Like I've said.If done intelligently, there really shouldn't be any reason why this type of training wouldn't work.Of course, some failings of this training could derive from it being coupled with a job that requires alot of physical exertion, not enough nutrition, not enough recuperation,etc.But obviously, if those variables are involved, it wasn't an honest(or intelligent) effort.I'm not trying to implicate you personally, but you seem to have a strong opinion on this and I'd like to know if you have any solid evidence to support you're opinion.Is there some research you've come across to discredit this training format that has worked wonders for many athletes and lifters(not to mention myself, as I'm speaking from personal experience)?If so, I'd like to see it.I'll be the first to admit that I'm not an expert, and anything I can learn about physical development I consider valuable.Once again, nothing personal.You have my utmost respect.