S
SSAlexSS
Guest
ballast said:I posted this on another thread but here it is again:
http://www.wsu.edu/~strength/twosess.htm
Two key points to this article, besides the reasearch that supports this idea, are one;you cut your training volume in half and spread it over two workouts, you do not double your workload simply because you are training twice.Second, a three week period was used.You don't train like this all the time.Poliquin recommends two weeks of multiple sessions/day alternated with at least one week of regular training, i.e. one session per day.Again, here is a previously posted link, by Poliquin this time, about the different types of two a day sessions.
http://t-mag.com/html/45cp.html
The major complaint of most people when they hear about this type of training is that it is too intense.That's true of everything when you first try it whether it is supersets, drop sets, maxing out.Intensity is one way to build bigger and stronger muscles, and you have to manipulate intensity in order to achieve a certain level of development and also to avoid overtraining.Going back to the first article, take a look at the population of Haakkinen's study.The test subjects were women.All I hear in the gym and on the boards are a bunch of guys talking about how they can bench 350 or squat 500 but they balk at the idea of splitting their volume in half and training twice in one day.Then you've got these female athletes making documented gains on an idea that is supposedly too intense for a bunch of strong lifters like us?Too intense is starting to sound like a copout to me.
Very good post! You people read the word of wisdom here!!