Pro and cons for 2 workouts a day

[SSAlexSS]

then this is sure fire way to end up making LESS gains. You need the time to grow.

The maxim that you have no business coming to a gym before you are fully recovered is flawed and not based on anything.


I dont know, but I do my best gains on high volume! ANd I want people to know what really works. I care about peoples progress and it saddens me when they waste their youth following some
weak routine that is only designed for your average joe, a guy who just ISNT interested in getting big.

No. most of these passive routines are designed for Joe public who wants to spend as much time on his cozy sofa as possible. To make sure that he doesnt feel bad and BUYS your training book/equipment yoiu need to CONVINCE him with gibberish that the method works and put down any hard (and real) way of training down.

Its easy to disporve that volume method doesnt work. IT IS VERY HARD TRAINING and most people just arent ready for it, so its easy that way to make them quit it.

People WANT to beleive that you could build muscle in 3 easy painless workouts per week.

too bad world doesnt work that way.

 

[Your_Moms_Kneepads]

99% of all pros use volume approach, and as you see - it works!

Sprinters who have big legs, they dont just do one sprint, the do many! OFTEN! and you cant argue with their progress!


3 sets is better than 1. It is been proven everywhere where HIT jedies havent distorted the truth yet.

99% of what? LIke you keep tabs? LIke you know them? 3 sets is better than one? If you did 9 reps to failure.Racked the weight and did 3 more, and re-racked and did 2 more, all with an slow negative phase you have fucking intensity. Why do 15 sets for a body part? Because its counterproductive.
DO yourself a favor and bury the sprinter argument to.
Also I never said shit about HIT for the record.

 

[SSAlexSS]

99% of what? LIke you keep tabs? LIke you know them? 3 sets is better than one? If you did 9 reps to failure.Racked the weight and did 3 more, and re-racked and did 2 more, all with an slow negative phase you have fucking intensity. Why do 15 sets for a body part? Because its counterproductive.
DO yourself a favor and bury the sprinter argument to.
Also I never said shit about HIT for the record.

When you do sets you send your body a signal to build more muscle. The bigger your muscle are the more sets you have to do to fully deplete it and grow as much of it as possible. 5 sets could be enough for biceps (small muscle). FOr legs you would need to do much more sets since you have much more fibers to exhaust! Also as your muscles become bigger and bigger, they require more and more stimulus to grow. Thus more sets.

1-5 sets may be enough for beginners biceps to grow. 5 sets for advanced trainees biceps would be barely enough to maintain them unless his biceps are doing most of his rowing, chinning, and pulling work.


That is logical. HIT and sissy arguments are not logical!