Kwai-Chang Caine, my comments weren't meant to establish me as the authority on martial arts. I've only been training for 15 years, while many others I've trained under have trained for 3 times that. However, I do think it is important to remind people that martial arts is 80% mental, and only 20% physical. I've seen these arguments on what the "best" martial art is over and over again, but the entire discussion is based on techniques - not the individual characteristics of the person or the quality of their instruction.
I speak out of frustration, not egotism, because I've competed and believe the quality of competitor has decreased even from 10 years ago. Full contact fighting has been televised since the late-1960s, it isn't something new to the martial arts world. Try to get your hands on a few copies of fights back then, and I think you will agree that the respect that the competitors show each other in and out of the ring and the quality of their technique is superior to that of competitors today. I am frustrated that so many schools have become "black belt factories," and these "black belts" walk into a competition as if they were streetfighters - no respect, no honor, no humility. It is sad to see this occuring.
Of course, there are exceptions (i.e. Sakuraba), but I speak in general terms.
I respect everyone's opinion, but I think it is important to make the distinction between martial arts and fighting arts. Even if you disagree with me on that definition, I've spoken with many masters that have this same perspective, and would like to preserve the traditional values that the martial arts instill.
I'm sorry if I offended you.