LOL
So should I have paid the 150 to get it resized? We turned it into the store when we planned on getting married, she left while it was still at the store, when I got it I had to pay 150 because of the resizing but should she have paid it?
I owe her 100 because she I took it out of her account the day she left me, but I lost about 500 profit on the ring
What do you mean by profit? You sayin that the ring:
1. appreciated THAT MUCH in value AFTER you bought it?
2. you had to turn down a buyer for the ring?
As for haggling over 150$, I understand the principle involved. Whoever paid for the resizing is out the money because the ring ended up back in the jeweler's possession. However, 150$ is a small price to pay to sever all ties with someone. I guess if whoever is out the money felt strongly enough about the principle to take it to small claims court the judge might rule that the two of you split it equally or that SHE pay the money because afterall, she is the one who broke the engagement off.
If I were to advise either of you as a friend I would say to eat the money and call it a day. Imagine if this were only weeks before the wedding. You'd BOTH be out a substantial amount of cash, deposits in many cases (as in reception halls, photographers, tux rental, dresses, etc) are NON-REFUNDABLE PERIOD. Wedding dresses can run up into the thousands, easily several hundred, then you add the shoes, veil, etc - the money that all the groomsmen and bridesmaids are out for bridal shower, gift, bachelor/bachelorette party, their attire, then there are deposits for the limos, honeymoon... You feel what I am saying?
I am thinking since we are talking ONE WEEK all of this expense was not incurred. If you paid for the resizing, just eat the loss. If she paid you could (I believe legally - not sure though, I am not an attorney) take the position, "You broke the engagement so too damned bad for you." Or you could just refund her the money so she will never EVER have a reason to bother you again.
It's your call.
Just my .02