Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Secretly hoping boyfriend will do GH

all im saying is that people shouldnt say it is impossible for anything unless you really know.when i added slin and t3 to my gh and gear usage i was gaining 2 to 3 pounds a day for 2 weeks and losing fat.i would of thought that to be impossible but it happened and i have been around for awhile(10yrs of training and gear).remember, doctors used to say anabolics dont build muscle,well i think they were wrong.im not trying to start an arguement with you.i really just didnt like the fact that someone said gh has too many health problems and isnt worth the risk. actually i agree that the kid probably didnt gain that much on his arms but imo i wouldnt say it couldnt happen, thats all.
 
spatterson said:
Perhaps I missed the boat, but you are defending the point NY is making. You made those gains because you stacked it with AS. GH alone is not that anabolic, and if you believe it is, I'd love to see the scientific data on that.

GODDAMN!

nice ass...
 
I could think of something on spatts body that would make something on me grow..... (hint see her avatar)
 
ok,lets back up a sec.your data from michael mooney is about aids patients and it doesnt say if they are training or not,so im going to assume that you mean they are training while on gh and have aids.but he is debating serostims claims to reverse muscle wasting in aids patients.well that statement is not and does not relate to someone who is healthy and their immune system is working properly and training with weights while injesting large amounts of protein.as such there isnt a proper study as of yet to report the effects of gh on a healthy trained individual.everyone who takes gh is doing so without scientific data to back up anything.nobody even knows that right time to take gh.everyone has their own oppion on it but it seems that no matter when you take it,gh works.now i told my experience with gh and gear.and no,i havent taken gh by itself so i dont know what it would or wouldnt do,so what right do i have to say what would happen?the data isnt there to show what happens when gh is taken alone and until it is,why is everyone so quick to say gh wont work by itself.
 
ok,without having to do the experiment,tell me why when people use gh as a bridge,(as a friend of mine has done) it dramatically reduces the lose of muscle.gh must be doing something for muscle tissue(what its doing i dont know)do you?if gh can hold muscle mass then why couldnt it build it by itself?you say people have tried gh by itself and gotten nothing,well ok then, but i would question if the gh was fake.most people who say they got nothing from gh 99% of the time has fake gh.anyway the has gone farther then intended.i just wanted to express my point of view so i will end this thing here.

(your words)
Asking for proof that GH wouldn't produce gains like that is like asking to prove that Triaminic Cough and Cold won't repair connective tissue. It's not made to do that. Stack that Triaminic with some ox, and you may see improvement in connective tissue, but that doesn't mean it was caused by the Triaminic.

ok, so then what is gh made to do then?
 
Top Bottom