E Elite_Fry Guest Jul 19, 2001 #1 just wondering which one... everyone always meantion tuna but what about salmon?
I IGoRyEk69 New member Jul 19, 2001 #2 Tuna is a great source of protein with almost no fat, salmon is great also and the fats are healthy
D diamonddiceclay New member Jul 19, 2001 #3 salmon is listed as a great meal in the metabolic diet book
8 8-] New member Jul 19, 2001 #4 Salmon has a lot more fat than tuna but it is 'good' in that it is high in Omega 3 oils. As long as the extra calories don't harm your diet salmon is good. Tastes good too.
Salmon has a lot more fat than tuna but it is 'good' in that it is high in Omega 3 oils. As long as the extra calories don't harm your diet salmon is good. Tastes good too.
B Belial New member Jul 19, 2001 #5 Usually salmon if I can get it. Tuna's cheaper, though, and I buy flax seperately, so it's not a must.
Usually salmon if I can get it. Tuna's cheaper, though, and I buy flax seperately, so it's not a must.
8 8-] New member Jul 19, 2001 #7 Canned salmon does taste better than canned tuna IMO. ....although a nice tuna steak is pretty nice
A AGENT SHAGWELL New member Jul 19, 2001 #8 if cost is not an issue....always SALMON....fatty acids, and less mercury......unfortunately cost is an issue
if cost is not an issue....always SALMON....fatty acids, and less mercury......unfortunately cost is an issue
A AGENT SHAGWELL New member Jul 19, 2001 #10 Tuna and mercury stuff: http://www.enn.com/news/enn-stories/2001/01/01152001/mercury_41312.asp http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/07/12/mercury.report.enn/
Tuna and mercury stuff: http://www.enn.com/news/enn-stories/2001/01/01152001/mercury_41312.asp http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/07/12/mercury.report.enn/