Guess THIS bodyfat.... please?

[DanielBishop]

I saw another post like this further down, and I was intrigued.... my photos were taken at the end of my last cutting phase (I know I wasn't TOO cut, but it kinda came to an end because I gave in and went back to bulking) and at this time, the so-called fat-monitor at the gym.... which was meant to be pretty accurate, clocked me at 16%.

See what you think. I don't think I was 16%. Disappointed if I was.

 

[DanielBishop]

Another one.

Here's another pic, same day. Different angle.

 

[Delinquent]

Don't worry bro, you're no where near 16%. I would say around 9%-10 at the max with the kind of definition you have in your abs

 

[atlas]

9% approx

 

[diamonddiceclay]

10-11%

 

[Tha One CrumCake]

8.6 - 9.1%

Good job bro, I give you prpps for not being a fat motherfucker.....

... now time for bulkin up.

400 grams of protein a day for 6 months shall do tha trick.

PeaCe

 

[bigmag]

I'd say closer to 7 or 8%

 

[DanielBishop]

Those pics were taken in May some time, I think.... I'm a lot fatter now.

And I've been trying endlessly to bulk up since I was like.... 16. Doesn't work too well.... I have terrible genetics for it. But I'm doing the best I can.

400g of protein? I doubt I'd be even getting 1g/lb of bodyweight nowadays.... can't afford supplements, and it's just not so easy for me to be eating that much food in my current situation.

 

[La0Tz3]

if you cant afford supplements, try skim milk powder, in Australia its cheap as shit, tastes like it too but thats what being hardcore is about ;-)
about 30g protein, 50g carbs, 1g fat in 100g (which would normally make 1L of milk)
i buy 2kg of powder for AU$10.55
if anyone knows a serious reason not to use skim milk powder, please PM me because I am curious

 

[da big thinker]

your abs are lean and would say that you have approx 8-10mm of fat on your stomach(which is excellent)...nevertheless,your bf% isn't determined by the fat content on your stomach...how many sites were used for your examination?the more sites the more accurate...perhaps your back and legs contain a little more fat than expected,hence the higher total bf%...although it is possible that you were 16%,in this picture i would say 10%...but i'm only going by the picture you have provided and i am merely judging it from that...the calipers,in my opinion,would've been more precise(keeping in mind that a pro trainer was taking your sites)...

ps:abs look sharp in those pics...congrats.