equal rights for men

[Bikini Mod]

Not a right. A women can be a house wife and never have to work at any job for any pay. She may choose to work, but still has the choice.
Men don't get sugar mommies, or a choice.

That is not equal

Actually I knew of several men that chose to be "house men" - they hated it. Nobody gave them respect, no benefits or vacation days - work was 24/7 so they fucking buckled put their kids in day care and WENT BACK TO WORK.

So you were saying?

 

[deltreefitness]

Not a right. A women can be a house wife and never have to work at any job for any pay. She may choose to work, but still has the choice.
Men don't get sugar mommies, or a choice.

That is not equal

It may be rare but I've seen it happen. In my own family. Stay-at-home dads are out there.

Although when I see a sugar daddy I just feel bad for him.

 

[Austin316]

so saying that the person proven to be the best parent should be given custody of their children is living in a fantasy world?

RIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggGGGGGGGGhhhhhHHHHHHHTTTTTTTtttttttttTTTTT!!!

I don't know where you get your facts from, especially since every state treats this differantly (and almost all favor the woman as the primary caretaker) but unless the parents themselves come to an agreement that renders things 50/50 the courts do NOT favor the men generally speaking

 

[Eringobraugh]

Ill just give a tiny seemingly insignificant example. It is a fact that women have to work harder in the same job for less pay.

YOUR DICK (NOT YOUR ABILITY OR EXPERIENCE) DECIDES YOU GET MORE MONEY.

That is not equal.

Stop using the word rights in those examples, its wrong here. Thats an example of a workplace injustice. It has nothing to do with rights or human rights or natural rights or civil rights.Claims that have some justification behind them. A moral right is a morally justified claim. A legal right is a legally justified claim. When we use the term right without specifying the nature of the justification, we usually mean a moral right. Rights specify the acts that are permitted, forbidden, or required. If they specify the acts that the rights-holder may perform (such as vote, or drive a car), they are often called licenses. If they specify acts that others may not perform (as the right to life obliges others not to kill the rights holder), they are called liberties or negative rights. If they specify what the rights-holder should receive, they are called rights of entitlement or positive rights.

 

[Bikini Mod]

huh?
that happens all the time

Ummmmmmm nope.

Women are told to get a job and work a 40 hour work week so the men have to pay less childsupport. Then the dumb bastard man has a hairy conniption because he didnt realize that he would still be made to be for most of the childcare related expenses while his exwife works. So now - BOTH parents work like dogs to pay total strangers to essentially raise their children. And because their time is 50/50 NEITHER of them sees their children for any real amount of time where either of them can parent.

The children are ALWAYS divided 50/50 unless the parents agree to other arrangements or unless one of the parents murders someone. Who either the mother or the father fucks is NEVER taken into consideration.... unless it is the woman. Then it becomes an issue.

Yea, that is real fair..... isn't it?

 

[Ulcasterdropout]

Actually I knew of several men that chose to be "house men" - they hated it. Nobody gave them respect, no benefits or vacation days - work was 24/7 so they fucking buckled put their kids in day care and WENT BACK TO WORK.

So you were saying?

A women supporting a man? I've never seen it.
I believe you, just can't imagine it. What a fucking loser...

 

[Bikini Mod]

so saying that the person proven to be the best parent should be given custody of their children is living in a fantasy world?

RIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggGGGGGGGGhhhhhHHHHHHHTTTTTTTtttttttttTTTTT!!!

I don't know where you get your facts from, especially since every state treats this differantly (and almost all favor the woman as the primary caretaker) but unless the parents themselves come to an agreement that renders things 50/50 the courts do NOT favor the men generally speaking

Sorry again you dont know what you are speaking of.

The courts SHOULD FAVOR the better parent.

Guess what?

THEY DONT.

They divide the children 50/50 and the retard bastard man that goes on and on about "what a whore" his exwife is only succeeded in jacking up legal bills, fucking up his kids, and paying a ton of money additionally in childcare related expenses while THEY BOTH work and NEITHER of them has any real time with their children.

THIS IS REALITY.

How many women do you know who have sole physical or even primary residential custody of their children unless both parents agreed to it? Answer? - slim to none.

MOST HAVE 50/50 SPLIT.

 

[Bikini Mod]

A women supporting a man? I've never seen it.
I believe you, just can't imagine it. What a fucking loser...

So what you are saying is that raising children and taking care of a home has ZERO VALUE? Well no fucking wonder it is "a woman's job" then?

 

[hamstershaver]

lol she has said the "bastard man" 2x already in 2 different posts
we all know its never the womans fault
someone has some serious issues
thanks for the laughs tonight

 

[Ulcasterdropout]

Then the dumb bastard man has a hairy conniption because he didnt realize that he would still be made to be for most of the childcare related expenses while his exwife works. So now - BOTH parents work like dogs to pay total strangers to essentially raise their children. And because their time is 50/50 NEITHER of them sees their children for any real amount of time where either of them can parent.

Both parents see the kids 50/50, but the 'dumb bastard' man has to pay most of the childcare related expenses? Nice example