Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Sust users: This is a Myth, right?
- Thread starter Redux
- Start date
sh4dowf4lcon
New member
majutsu said:
Now here is Redux's post:
Redux said:
Now I am telling you Majutsu and Redux that is total horseshit. We arent talking trunks and we arent talking HRT for 70 yr olds. We're talking BB doses and training. If you are working bench and squats and eating right and sleeping right, your traps will not grow misproportionately to the other parts of your body you are training. When I do squats my traps wont grow, period.
read his post, before you start calling anyone a moron Majutsu...he said they told him "ALL test adds meat mostly to your TRAPS regardless of your workout"
I say BULLSHIT, and I have my own body and training not some study done somewhere as proof positive I am correct.
as you were.
majutsu
Well-known member
Shadow, I never said redux's gym buddies were right. That's what Ulter kept thinking I was saying too at first.
I just said there is a different interesting question in that urban legend. So what if it's off topic. I like to look for the silver lining in strange threads, I guess. Like goldenD said, the half-related alternate topic I keep bringing up is kinda cool when you think about it.
The original post said more or less "test grows traps". This is wrong. However, it raises the related interesting question, "On the same diet and workout routine, would one stack yield a different body growth pattern than some other stack in the same individual?" Most of us would probably say "yes". Otherwise comments like "this is a good bulker" or "this is a good cutter" or "this causes bloat more than that" would not be said. Of course things like androgenicity, estrogen, progesterone, and water retention are part of these variables. So if different stacks can cause different body growth changes in the same individual with the same diet and routine, it would not be hard to imagine that some gym rats would take these ideas, some odd studies, and come up with this "test build traps" idea. It may be wrong, but it's pretty easy to see where they probably got this stuff. And wouldn't it be neat if anabolic science progressed to the point where some future stack built say back and tris preferentially?!?
I like to play with ideas, even bad ones, as something fun usually pops out anyway.
I just said there is a different interesting question in that urban legend. So what if it's off topic. I like to look for the silver lining in strange threads, I guess. Like goldenD said, the half-related alternate topic I keep bringing up is kinda cool when you think about it.
The original post said more or less "test grows traps". This is wrong. However, it raises the related interesting question, "On the same diet and workout routine, would one stack yield a different body growth pattern than some other stack in the same individual?" Most of us would probably say "yes". Otherwise comments like "this is a good bulker" or "this is a good cutter" or "this causes bloat more than that" would not be said. Of course things like androgenicity, estrogen, progesterone, and water retention are part of these variables. So if different stacks can cause different body growth changes in the same individual with the same diet and routine, it would not be hard to imagine that some gym rats would take these ideas, some odd studies, and come up with this "test build traps" idea. It may be wrong, but it's pretty easy to see where they probably got this stuff. And wouldn't it be neat if anabolic science progressed to the point where some future stack built say back and tris preferentially?!?
I like to play with ideas, even bad ones, as something fun usually pops out anyway.
Last edited:
sh4dowf4lcon
New member
Its all good. There was some good info in this thread. I took it personal when you stated "the morons are calling bullshit" lol
Still there is some good info in this thread. Thanks for contributing.
Still there is some good info in this thread. Thanks for contributing.
Munkieballs
New member
My traps are my fastest growing muscle. I think you could argue that they would be the most sensitive to gear as well. I still think it's a pretty ridiculous statement. If it even has a thread of truth I wouldn't worry about it. Pay attention to yourself in the mirror. If your traps grow out of proportion to the rest of your body, ease up on training that targets them (I have to do this all the time). I don't mean offense by this, but someone worrying about this is like when women avoid lifting weights because they think they will get too big. A muscle has to get halfway too big before it is fully too big.
