Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Same sex marriages, good or bad

you're just doing the same thing anti-gay marraige folks are doing, and getting yelled at. Presenting "arguments" against it. But the gay folks are saying "it's our RIGHT".

I'm saying the same thing. It's my RIGHT to marry a mountain goat. And since gay's are saying marraige is NOT about procreation -- then it's fine for me to marry my sister or mountain goat.

If we're gonna re-write what marraige really is -- we gotta allow all other kinds of variations. Many of which have been allowed for THOUSANDS of years in other religions (eg: multiple wives, marrying young, marrying family members (a practice still done in Africa) etc. etc.).

The REASON the US only accepts man and woman, is cuz 99.99% of the religions on this planet, universally accept that as "marraige". An adult single male marrying an adult single female. This way the gov't keeps it's nose out of church vs state, and wipes it's hands cleans of extreme marraige variations and views by all the 5,000 religions.
 
No, I'm providing valid arguments that can be backed up by research. The anti-gay people aren't backing up their research with any real medical agencies. There is a big difference. And, feel free to marry your billy goat but don't blame me when the thing bites off your dick when you ask for a blowjob.

And regarding religion, there is a thing called separation of church and state that negates that take.
 
I'm not gay, and I have only a couple friends who are. But Ontario was one of the first regions in the world to allow gay marriages. I think that is impressive, we are ahead of most of the world on the issue.
 
>The anti-gay people aren't backing up their research with any real medical agencies

They are. Gay people can't pro-create, nor is there any *gene* that has been isolated that forces people to like only *their* sex. Liking your own sex, is medically still a preference, like me liking my mountain goat.

Hey don't make fun of my mountain goat dammit!!!!
 
Ah, extremes on either side of an argument to demonstrate why change shouldn't occur weakens the arguments. While you may have valid points, you're not doing them any good by taking an extreme to demonstrate them. And the 99.99% number is shear hogwash again weakening any valid points you may have.

There is marriage in the religious context and marriage in the legal context. Since the religious context doesn't create laws, then I'm going to ignore that for now. The laws governing marriage differ widely from state to state. Like how old you can be, what consent is required, etc. Divorce is the dissolution of the marriage contract. The rights and benefits or disadvantages of marriage is going to change over time as it has in the past. What is going to be rewritten is the legal definition of marriage. Whether it is rewritten to allow for same sex marriages or disallow same sex marriages.

The goat, sister ad nausea argument is too obtuse to even address with an argument. Not to mention it's a complete distraction from the issues at hand.
 
ttlpkg said:
Or if a man does not know how his penis was intended to be used...

I see that you're avoiding my other posts to you . . . and there are plenty of "straight black men" that have HIV because of the way that they use their penis . . . Just the facts dude.
 
justyxxxx said:
Why is it that some of you take one thing and turn it into this whole imaginary What if AND AND What if AND AND What if?

Because they are logical conclusions. Polygamy is being argued in court because of the Texas sodomy case.

A 14 year old usually doesn't know what they want and the total extent of their actions. They are just that - too young.

There are psychologists who are disagreeing with you, and me, and claiming that children should have the right to consensual sex with adults.

There are actual medical reasons why you shouldn't marry someone as close as your sister. And about the right to marry more than one woman, well if a woman is that stupid to allow a guy to fuck different women, then she's too dumb to know what she wants. Now the goat idea, that's not such a bad idea . . . I'll have to consider asking the Democrats to support that.

I have no problem with any contractual unions between people, two, three, men, women, just don't usurp a taken concept in attempt to gain acceptance. The special interest groups are against the idea of "civil unions" or other terms, even with equal benefits; this demonstrates some underlying agenda other than just "marriage".

You have a right to act without harming others; you don't have a right to be accepted. I will defend your right to do what you will, but I don't have to accept your position.
 
justyxxxx said:
I see that you're avoiding my other posts to you . . . and there are plenty of "straight black men" that have HIV because of the way that they use their penis . . . Just the facts dude.

There is something MAGIC in what you just said.
 
Top Bottom