shape
New member
needsize said:455 x 8, 465 x 6, ass to the floor, no belt or wraps were my best, and I have videos kicking around here of them.
I personally would like to see some videos to see some of the squats posted on here, as it is the internet and anyone can claim anything. And it doesnt even remotely come close to being called a squat, unless it is to parallel, but to the floor is even better. And saying that will give you a huge ass is an old wives tale, I squat very heavy all the way down, and have built some pretty huge quads out of it, and my ass is no where near too big. More often than not that thats an excuse to avoid the drop in working weight when you go all the way down
nice numbers bro-but do you not feel that when you go past parallel you releive pressure from the quad???
also I am off the mindset that narrow stance smiths allow you to target the quad more- ok the free-squat is an "overall mass builder" blah-blah-blah-but if your goal is just to increase quad size do you not think the smith is better???? better control easier to feel the quad working
what do you think???