The_Future said:
I am actually gonna disagree with the general rule you are stating. I would state that a wider grip tends to work more of the insertion point of the lat thus giving the concept of working the outer portion.
My thoughts are rowing movements tend to work the general mass of the back while a stretching movement like a pulldown or pullover tends to work the width.
I'm not going to get into this but I think its worth noting the difference between the lats and the midback(traps etc)......as stated and confirmed with emg analysis - a seated row is a pretty good choice for mid-back development......
Do this.......take a regular grip and a typical seated row handle(saddle) - pull into stomach and try to flex the midback.
Now take a wide grip on a straight bar and pull a bit higher into the sternum and flex mid back.
You cant compare wide-grip pulldowns and compare the same grip on seated rows and assume the outcome is the same....It wont be - as the AOP(angle of pull) is totally different.
a pulldown is not a stretch position for the lats btw - it has to be a position where the arms are extended above AND behind(posterior) the head
Saying that rows = mass and pulldowns = width is a bit too simplistic.
Hand grips, angles of pull, and rotation or non rotation of shoulder blades and even the amount of wegith as a % maximum all make an impact on the details of where the target area get hit.
Do some widegrip curls to failure
DO some close grip curls to failure
then compare the areas of soreness
....what about angles as they involve foot position on leg exercises??
Toes in??
Toes out??
Does that make a difference??
Yes it does...emg confirms this....same applies to ALL muscle groups