Stillgoing
New member
BodyByFinaplix said:
Hmm... I don't know, ask every Mr. Olympia before 1981 how they recovered. Prior to Menzer and Jones entering the scene, guys like Arnold and Ferigno seemed to be growing just fine on this frequincy, using less drugs than most amature level bodybuilders use today.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe bodybuilding is the only sport that relies heavily on weight training as the primary form of exercise, where any of the champions train a body part once a week, and the best guys in the sport train alot more frequintly. Why are so many juiceheads worried about overtraining? Alot of natural guys make great gains with high frequincy training, and the primary advantage enhanced atheletes have is accelerated recovery ability.
I gained 31 ibs and a great deal of strength, after taking the picture in my avatar, quite well training each body part 3 times a week. I never felt over-trained, or had periods of time in by bulking phase where I didn't gain strength or weight.
Well, I don't think I deserved the condescending tone, it was a legitimate question. Your response insinuated that 3x per week is an obviously superior method. I would strongly disagree with that.
I've gained a few pounds of muscle in my day too, and it came a shitload faster on 1x per week. But, everyones different I guess. I can't even imagine what a training schedule for 3x per week would look like. My personal opinion is once you reach a decent base level of mass, it is heavier poundages that create material amounts of additional mass, period. To focus on increasing lifts, substantial amounts of recup time are required. But - that time has to be put to productive use, meaning your eating and resting and when you hit the gym again, you are pounding it heavier.