Garry Frank's 2800 total

[Throw2Far]

throw2far, WTF is wrong with Coan's squat there?

he went below parallel. what is the problem?

For today's standards he is perfect. For the standards of Kaz's day, it would not have been considered a good lift. His back way 45degrees, not perpendicular.

The statements you have made on this thread pretty much sum of the fact that you have no business making comments on this forum. You have absolutely no clue what you are even babbling.

I guess you have not followed the history of powerlifting whatsoever. Yes to today's standards he made a good lift but those standards have been significantly loosened throughout the years.

 

[Chambewy20]

For today's standards he is perfect. For the standards of Kaz's day, it would not have been considered a good lift. His back way 45degrees, not perpendicular.



I guess you have not followed the history of powerlifting whatsoever. Yes to today's standards he made a good lift but those standards have been significantly loosened throughout the years.

I would assume your an experienced powerlifting judge to make that type of generalization?

 

[jcp2]

For today's standards he is perfect. For the standards of Kaz's day, it would not have been considered a good lift. His back way 45degrees, not perpendicular.



I guess you have not followed the history of powerlifting whatsoever. Yes to today's standards he made a good lift but those standards have been significantly loosened throughout the years.

Your back position has nothing to do with a good lift. I have no clue what you are talking about, bring this to a powerlifting message board and see what they have to say. I have never even seen Ed make a squat that was not significantly below parallel. You make yourself look dumber with every post.

 

[Throw2Far]

Your back position has nothing to do with a good lift. I have no clue what you are talking about, bring this to a powerlifting message board and see what they have to say. I have never even seen Ed make a squat that was not significantly below parallel. You make yourself look dumber with every post.

Powerlifting has evolved and I am trying to explain to you that you could not have possibly gotten into this goodmorning position (which makes it easier to squat) without the squat suits that are now used.

Why do you keep talking about this "below parallel" bullshit... I never mentioned that he didn't go below parallel...

 

[Throw2Far]

jcp2 post up a pic and then we'll see whos bullshitting... wait how bout i post up a pic of me on the cover of a magazine... will that do ? ?


Check my gallery... notice the same goatee and chain in all the pics? ya bitch... thats right...

 

[jcp2]

jcp2 post up a pic and then we'll see whos bullshitting... wait how bout i post up a pic of me on the cover of a magazine... will that do ? ?


Check my gallery... notice the same goatee and chain in all the pics? ya bitch... thats right...

Kaz wore a squat suit, so i am not sure what you are talking about. eddie competed before all the big equipment came out, and still lifts single ply in an inzer hardcore which is pretty much garbage imo. getting yourself into a GM position when squatting is mechanics, i as well as others do it when we squat raw. I still have no clue what you are saying. If anything squat suits keep you more erect.

Bye the way how did how pretty you are even make it into this conversation. Does that somehow validate your point, because you have nice abs and have been on the cover of some magazine. And the "ya bitch, thats right", I am not even sure i can even take you seriously after that. Their are pics of me on the net, my real name is on this forum somewhere, i have nothing to hide from.

 

[jcp2]

OH, and good luck with your football career, i wish you the best. You may be a world class athlete, you are just wrong on this topic, you are completely missing something somewhere when it comes to squatting and gear.

 

[jcp2]

Powerlifting has evolved and I am trying to explain to you that you could not have possibly gotten into this goodmorning position (which makes it easier to squat) without the squat suits that are now used.

Why do you keep talking about this "below parallel" bullshit... I never mentioned that he didn't go below parallel...

OK, now i see what you are saying, and like i said prior, squat suits keep you out of that good morning position, not put you in it. Have you ever squatted in a suit?

 

[kethnaab]

just thought I'd mention that it is impossible to be perpendicular to the ground in the lowest portion of a squat without falling over.

simply physically impossible.

 

[jcp2]

just thought I'd mention that it is impossible to be perpendicular to the ground in the lowest portion of a squat without falling over.

simply physically impossible.

Maybe, but you can would be surprised at how close you can be in a canvas suit.