What did that have to do with anything I said? Would you disagree with what I said?
that Im not anti gun...that the "training" in weaponry the average civilian receives is a joke..
that the notion that some average joe in the auditorium could have stopped this guy if only they hand a concealed carry permit and weapon on them at the time is absurd
its incredibly absurd
I never took an anti gun, or a strong gun control stance and yet because I say it is unlikely someone with a weapon would have stopped this guy..you're jumping all over your position
and assume I oppose guns
I may even agree with your stance on guns themselves but think that your argument is invalid...its called logic based reasoning..try it some time