Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

seized and IP will not resent order

i don't get it?

RdStrcklnd said:
I have ordered from IP several times, each time I sent him one Email with the info he asked for, and in less than two weeks I got my package. His prices are unbeliveable, and you better believe that if he wasn't around with his low prices everyone would be charging a lot more for stuff like anavar, dbol, etc. In my opinion hes one of the best, you know his stuff is legit and you know hes not going to scam you.

So what he is doing to me is NORMAL?????
 
i don't know if they protect him

Anal AssPlorer said:
Jeff - sorry to hear this happened to you. You have been around quite a long time and you have a very good insight on many subjects. You and M18 have just convinced me of what my opinion of IP is.

Why is Triedia so intent on protecting him?

i am not saying his goods are good or bad, that's up to the person to make up his mind.

No way i would have wasted $1350 if i had know, that he would NOT resend when seized. Furthermore, he decided to put "Melatonine" on the package, not me. He did this the first time as well, with a small order and it came through. But still if he would have mentionned Ginseng or Thee it would have passed, simple as that.
 
MUSTANG_18 said:


** is a brand as well as the name of a source but it has been used so freely around the boards that it is common nature. You openly named a source which is not allowed. Next time think! I don;'t have an attitude at all and I always act like a mod and enforce the rules so who the hell are you to tell me I am doing otherwise ?

M18
It is a generic product not a brand name. I don't know what you consider a source, but someone who makes it and deals it sure as hell sounds like a source to me. And I am telling you you are doing otherwise, because you are. Enforcing something some of the times, when it suits you, is not very kosher.
 
Pennywise said:

Enforcing something some of the times, when it suits you, is not very kosher.

Please explain how me doing this woul suit me ? I am not a source nor do I back either sources in question on this thread so I would like to know how ? ** is mentioned in just about every 2 thread on this board but the other one was not...You can't think you were right in posting a legit sources name openly to try and prove a point and if you feel you did nothing wrong then I feel very sorry for you

M18
 
i am leaving in 1 hour for France

but will stop in Liege when i return. That's where the package is.
1) i will wait for the customs letter after that, because they will NOT give it to me, but i will give it another try.
2) once i know who will do the analysing, i will ask THEM to give me my package back. Once they tell me what is in it (can well be Melatonine, why not?, i will ask my doc a prescript and give it another try.
3) don't know how the GH (if GH) will react, since it has to be in the fridge and is not.

So i will inform everybody here. Those still wanting to order from the Chinaman, should have their head examinated.
 
sorry SynergyJim

I would have to disagree and say that he is a very unprofessional asshole.
 
MUSTANG_18 said:


if you feel you did nothing wrong then I feel very sorry for you

M18
As I feel the same sorrow for you because you think you are right. Just because his name is in every other thread proves to me that the mods only enforce the rules when they feel like it. Or when they don't like a particular person. A source is a source, and each should be treated the same. There is absolutely no reason one person should be listed openly all the time, especially when there is supposedly no open source posting.
 
Pennywise said:
As I feel the same sorrow for you because you think you are right. Just because his name is in every other thread proves to me that the mods only enforce the rules when they feel like it. Or when they don't like a particular person. A source is a source, and each should be treated the same. There is absolutely no reason one person should be listed openly all the time, especially when there is supposedly no open source posting.
I see your point BUT since I have not been told to delete anything naming ** openly unless it is a direct e-mail I see no reason to start now. As for you you named, that is the name of a source who as far as I know is very legit and I have been told to delete all threads or posts openly naming source. Why ** is not included in that list, don't ask me but I am doing my job

M18
 
MUSTANG_18 said:

I see your point BUT since I have not been told to delete anything naming ** openly unless it is a direct e-mail I see no reason to start now. As for you you named, that is the name of a source who as far as I know is very legit and I have been told to delete all threads or posts openly naming source. Why ** is not included in that list, don't ask me but I am doing my job

M18
I understand where you are coming from, but that is no reason to jump down someone's throat when they are trying to make a point. Maybe the mods should ask why one source is allowed to be named, mostly in defamation, and not any others. I also don't think you have to wait for the order to delete mention of his name, as you did not wait to do so for the guy I mentioned, who by the way is a ripoff.
 
Top Bottom