Seems like a lot of hyperbole, I'd be curious to read actual examples.
I recall one caller complaining that her husband wouldn't do "his 50%" share of the housework.She asked the woman if he was working (yes full time) and if she was (no). She then proceeded to advise the woman that the guy was already doing his job (supporting the family) and to get off his back about doing hers (taking care of the home) if she wasnt working.
The working mothers hate her because she advises to be a full time mother when possible (ie: when its for "self fulfillment" and not basic survival).
Ive her advise women not to withhold sex a s a form of punishment, and how she would never trade an orgasm for some petty spite (jokingly, hardly uptight). I've even heard her say what I consider to be a very wise an apt analogy. If a woman is constantly rejecting her husband (ie: not just because she is genuinely ill, or the occasional just really too tired) society teaches that the man is supposed to just accept the fact and do without. But the same people who say that are the first to excuse female cheating with a husband who does the same. That in fact if a guy just rejected his wife a few times the wife and all her friends would feel justified in lamabasting him, but it is completely acceptable to constantly wear down his esteem/good feeling/and confidence by routinely rejecting him and expecting him to "understand."
Pretty solid advice as far as Im concerned