blood_drinker
New member
A buddy of mine (damn big) at the gym, told me that was bullshit, from his own experience. He told me he trains 1h30 with no problem, and he is really intense.
is 45 mins just a fallacy for fat people (body for life excuse to save time)."?
I know that after 60 mins a catabolic hormone is released....but this guy trains for 1h 30. Maybe he is just more advanced and needs many more sets/?
I understand I'm gonna get answers like "if you go to MAXIMUM FAILURE AND INTENSITY there is no need to go 45 mins+ as you will be charred".
All fine and dandy. But theoretically, answer this question. Not from what you should be, but just "is it ok"?
I'm not going to do it. I don't have time , and usually I'm charred in under 60 mins. But I would like to know if BFL and that shit is bullshit (the theory) as it seems this catabolic hormone isn't all that catabolic considering you get a postworkout meal consisting of the right macronutrient ratios...l;.
is 45 mins just a fallacy for fat people (body for life excuse to save time)."?
I know that after 60 mins a catabolic hormone is released....but this guy trains for 1h 30. Maybe he is just more advanced and needs many more sets/?
I understand I'm gonna get answers like "if you go to MAXIMUM FAILURE AND INTENSITY there is no need to go 45 mins+ as you will be charred".
All fine and dandy. But theoretically, answer this question. Not from what you should be, but just "is it ok"?
I'm not going to do it. I don't have time , and usually I'm charred in under 60 mins. But I would like to know if BFL and that shit is bullshit (the theory) as it seems this catabolic hormone isn't all that catabolic considering you get a postworkout meal consisting of the right macronutrient ratios...l;.