I think (and sure someone will correct) its similar to a UK life sentence where a minimum recommendations is set before you can apply for parole. e.g. in Uk if you get life with a minimum of 21 years its post 21 years served you can apply for parole (no guarantee of acceptance).
I have found a few websites that discuss the evidence one is a free titus one but obviously very one sided. It does seem the evidence was outstanding against them so the sentance reflects that. That is not my opinion post research just a quick read has anyone else researched properly was it the right sentance?
Thats unreal, I think I remember reading that the both of them were hooked on meth and cocaine as well. The addiction to meth would explain the irrational behavior.
last time he went to jail he chose to serve the full sentence rather than take probation, which meant he wouldn't have to be drug-tested and therefore could start competing right away. I'm guessing he won't do that again.