Ok...I have trained from ages 16 to now 24. I went from 152 to 305lbs naturally. Anyone can do anything. I am not an expert, but I do have a solid base of knowledge.
All of this talk about the angle and placement of your hands when you do a row is for the birds. Don't worry yourself over this petty little stuff because in the end...it's not going to make a hill of beans worth of difference. It seems as if the people who spend their time worrying about tiny little things in their programs end up still benching 300lbs, squatting 400lbs and deadlifting less than both of them. They still have 17" arms and 26" thighs. The main thing is to find the most difficult exercises and kill yourself on them.
So, dead lifts do not increase muscular development? Ok...but what about my back? Do you think that doing deadlifts have increased the development of the muscles in my back? Just curious, because it seems that I am probably wasting my time by doing them if I am not going to increase my muscular development. I mean...if I get stronger in deadlifts...and "dead lifts greatly impact the lower back" and they do not "increase MUSCULAR DEVELOPEMENT" then it must all be in my head then huh?
I did ask my chiropractor about deadlifts and he did suggest them. He also suggest things such as squats and flat bench press and standing overhead presses. Did I mention that he is also an athlete? My doctors also told me at age 15 that I was going to die and if I lived I would always be skinny and fragile. Just because they say it doesn't make it absolutely true. Deadlifts do impact the lower back...but it does not mean that they are bad for the lower back.
Are they too dangerous? No. Nothing is too dangerous. Any exercise that may be seen as dangerous is also an exercise that will make you bigger and stronger. If you only stick to the "safe" exercises, then you will never excel in your given sport. Go ahead and stay in your comfort zone...I don't mind.
Furthermore MALE......your measurements indicate nothing to me. I have a friend that has a back as wide as a door frame, but I also leave out the fact that he is 5'6" and weighs 335. He also squats 900+lbs.
Yeah...ok...so I have no definition in my back...but it is not important to me either. What is important to me is that I can lift very heavy odd objects.
Congrats that you haven't done deadlifts in 5 years, but from your measurements...there seems to be no indications of thickness. I have a straw that is 24" long...but it's not very thick. Your measurements still tell me nothing, as far as they go...I could stand you at 50 yards and couldn't hit you with a 12 g shotgun.
B True
All of this talk about the angle and placement of your hands when you do a row is for the birds. Don't worry yourself over this petty little stuff because in the end...it's not going to make a hill of beans worth of difference. It seems as if the people who spend their time worrying about tiny little things in their programs end up still benching 300lbs, squatting 400lbs and deadlifting less than both of them. They still have 17" arms and 26" thighs. The main thing is to find the most difficult exercises and kill yourself on them.
So, dead lifts do not increase muscular development? Ok...but what about my back? Do you think that doing deadlifts have increased the development of the muscles in my back? Just curious, because it seems that I am probably wasting my time by doing them if I am not going to increase my muscular development. I mean...if I get stronger in deadlifts...and "dead lifts greatly impact the lower back" and they do not "increase MUSCULAR DEVELOPEMENT" then it must all be in my head then huh?
I did ask my chiropractor about deadlifts and he did suggest them. He also suggest things such as squats and flat bench press and standing overhead presses. Did I mention that he is also an athlete? My doctors also told me at age 15 that I was going to die and if I lived I would always be skinny and fragile. Just because they say it doesn't make it absolutely true. Deadlifts do impact the lower back...but it does not mean that they are bad for the lower back.
Are they too dangerous? No. Nothing is too dangerous. Any exercise that may be seen as dangerous is also an exercise that will make you bigger and stronger. If you only stick to the "safe" exercises, then you will never excel in your given sport. Go ahead and stay in your comfort zone...I don't mind.
Furthermore MALE......your measurements indicate nothing to me. I have a friend that has a back as wide as a door frame, but I also leave out the fact that he is 5'6" and weighs 335. He also squats 900+lbs.
Yeah...ok...so I have no definition in my back...but it is not important to me either. What is important to me is that I can lift very heavy odd objects.
Congrats that you haven't done deadlifts in 5 years, but from your measurements...there seems to be no indications of thickness. I have a straw that is 24" long...but it's not very thick. Your measurements still tell me nothing, as far as they go...I could stand you at 50 yards and couldn't hit you with a 12 g shotgun.
B True