I can not get into splitting hairs. When I say test is WORST, I mean it's pure androgen, hence, the most suppressive. That's the proof. The proof that people ask for sometimes doesn't exist. There's no proof to the contrary so all we can do is speculate based on existing knowledge. To simply disagree and say "prove it" is a little silly.
As Digger might have said; "Say why you disagree. Present your side. Give your reasoning. But don't just cut down an idea because you don;t like it. Use logic to debate, not emotion or posturing "
Yeah, there are worse compounds. HEROIN would be a worse cycle. But come one bros. Cut some slack.
I did not say Primo was mast and proviron, the inference was that the results were similar as is the effects form the molecular structure. How technical do we have to get?
As Digger might have said; "Say why you disagree. Present your side. Give your reasoning. But don't just cut down an idea because you don;t like it. Use logic to debate, not emotion or posturing "
Yeah, there are worse compounds. HEROIN would be a worse cycle. But come one bros. Cut some slack.
I did not say Primo was mast and proviron, the inference was that the results were similar as is the effects form the molecular structure. How technical do we have to get?