i agree with u, not with that its the most suppressive just because i dont know if it is, but with the fact that everyone needs to stop recommending test.
everyone seems to say u cant take this without test. well i took dbol without test and it was the shit, i basically consider it my first cycle because var didnt do shit. now im on test and winny, but i would much rather go back to taking 25mg of dbol.
The reason var didn't do shit is becaue it was either underdosed or bunk. Contrary to popular belief, var is very strong shit.
Ask layinback. He gets US manufactured legit pharm grade var, and he thinks 20mg pharm grade is stronegr than 60mg of UG stuff.
Dbol is a good first cycle if you ask me.
Test as a first cycle is also good.
Telling people to not take test as a first is strictly preference of Nelson. Yeah, test is suppressive. Guess what? We know, and doing proper PCT is where it's at.
Test will give you the best gains.
Primo is expensive as shit, and coming by good primo is tough, especially for a noob who hasn't been in the game long enough to know better. Even with all the research you can possibly do, inexperience is a set back.
Test is strong, abundant, cheap, low dose gives almost zero sides, and it's easy to control sides because your body already knows how to deal with fluctuating testosterone levels. That's what happens in puberty.
Test is best. Suppressive, not suppressive,or whatnot. Learn to love it.