Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Saw a woman in a full Burkha (sp) in Penn station

  • Thread starter Thread starter lartinos
  • Start date Start date
I think it's fine for banks, for example, to require such garb to be removed for security reasons. I don't think most businesses need such measures.

Indeed. Many banks have had these types of rules for a while. Im all for it.

But saying someone wearing a burka while fucking grocery shopping is a "security risk" just makes you sound like a fucking retard.
 
Please Google recent bombings with an open mind rather than Googling what you want to fit your views.

If you do, you'll see we should probably ban jeans as well. Fuck jeans, Yo. Terrorists wear jeans. You've probably worn some recently too, haven't you? Lart is a terrorist. Everybody who wears clothes a terrorist has worn is a terrorist.

Re-read SD's last post. He gets it.
 
What about while buying a car, or applying for credit or anything else involving identity?

Then you send your AA to do it.
 
It's easy for woman to defend burkhas when they don't have to wear them. To not have the freedom to wear or not wear one is fucked up and it also causes a security risk. Unfortunately as the terrorists get more desperate they will be up to more tricks. Saying, "It hasn't happened in awhile" proves nothing and should be more of the reason to look into stopping it. Would have been pretty smart if the US were more prepared for 9/11, but they weren't. One day this thread will get bumped for a bad reason and peoples views will change. time will tell..
 
9/11 was carried out with a few box cutters and look how easy that was for them. Extra restrictions prohibiting wearing head to toe disguises is not too much to ask. It has been debated if our laws are based on Judeo-Christian values but one thing is for certain that our laws are not based on Sharia law or Islam or anything else of that nature. So claiming tolerance in the name of religious freedom isnt going to cut it regarding this matter. The game has changed in the last 10 years and if it inconveniences some people tough shit. No disguises for government issue ID photos, Airports, Banks, or anywhere else where there is security risk for wearing disguises.
 
Last edited:
It begs the question Whether or not people should be allowed to wear these.
Who knows if it is woman, if they have a bomb in their hands.
All because we have to bow down to this cult and give them rights?

notsureifyoursrs!
 
Top Bottom