Tatyana
Elite Mentor
Ross said:Let me chime in here...
Nelson is correct, weight-training(done properly) is more effective for fat loss than cardio alone.
Cardio ONLY BURNS CALORIES WHILE YOU ARE DOING IT. Weight-training elevates the metabolism for 72 hours. Furthermore, muscle-mass increases the rate of calorie expidenture, so as you build muscle, you inevitably lose fat(if done peroperly)
However, for the serious bodybuilder trying to reach low single BF% digits without LOSING MUSCLE MASS(by restricting calories), LOW-INTENSITY CARDIO is absolutely necessary.
For me, that simply means 25 minutes of WALKING POST WORKOUT. Usually, on a slight incline at about 4 MPH. RUNNING is OFF LIMITS and is simply NOT part of the complex bodybuilding equation.
The ULTIMATE solution for fat-loss is a fully comprehensive program that includes weight-training and LOW-INTENSITY CARDIO.
Read that as competitive bodybuilder, which really doesn't apply to a lot of the peeps on this board.
I also request that all the bold claims about scientific FACTS are being stated when I assert:
- you do not have a scientific background, unclear about how to properly use the scientific method (therefore what is a legitmate bit of research or not)
- the research is conflicting
- there are genetic/biochemical/physiological variations in the human population that will NEVER have it be one way or the other. (see above point)
This is a gross oversimplification, but there are people who are 'fast' oxidisers and people who are 'slow' oxidisers.
There are enough people who are hostile towards science and the academic community, in particular, this is a trend in the US, and statements and marketing methods such as this contribute to it.