GenetiKing
New member
einstein1 said:This will be my last post in regards to overtraining on this thread, since we could probably argue all day about the issue (which would be a waste of both of our time).
There's nothing to argue over. Overtraining is clearly defined in many a textbook. It's not as if its definition is up for debate.
einstein1 said:Assuming his diet and rest are not factors, then what else is there to modify except his volume?
Plenty. In fact, the most important training aspect, intensity, hasn't even been addressed. Besides intensity...what about training frequency? The exercises themelves can be totally changed. The order of the exercises can be switched up. He can incorporate pre-exhaustion techniques. His training split can be rearranged. There are a million-and-one variables to be looked at when a particular routine is failing without even considering diet and rest. Volume reduction isn't necessarily always the answer...sometimes volume isn't even an issue. And I don't think it is here either. It's my honest opinion that Icculus isn't overreaching.
Icculus said:NOTE: I'm a fatass @ 20+ BF so I need to cut ALOT but bulk up a decent amount. Please give constructive critiques.
Going from this, I responded to his post as if the predominant goal was fat loss. We both know that you can't cut and bulk simultaneously. If he wants size and strength gains, then yes...that much cardio is too much catabolism. That's still not overtraining though. Simply being in a catabolic state doesn't indicate overtraining. If that were true, then pro bodybuilders would be overtraining every time they cut for a show.
einstein1 said:Genetiking: I hope you didn't take my last post personally.
Heck no bro! I enjoy these training discussions. I'm glad there are other knowledgable guys out there who I can argue with. I've read your posts, you seem to know your stuff well. Nothing personal here...