ghettostudmuffin
New member
I've seen you preaching this SDT training theory and I went to the guys site. Personally I think that brief write-up for Glad is about 10x easier to understand than the article I read.
SDT IMO, looks like an excellent method for progressing when you are at the high-intermediate to beginning-advanced stage of your lifting career.
I can see it's use at any stage of training since it's clearly flexible enough that you don't have to necessarily go up in weight the next week if you don't want to or aren't ready and instead do an extra set=more volume=increased homeostasis disruption or just add reps even if only 1 to the first set.
It actually sounds like a very quality lifting theory to base training off of, but I still think that 5x5 is probably superior for a beginning lifter or beginning to mid-level intermediate since straight single progression with the proper workload at this stage is more than sufficient to produce maximal increases in strength at this point in a lifter's career. That and 5x5 as you hit intermediate level can easily be periodized and teach a trainee the simplest form of periodization.
All that said I will probably use that SDT training in the future at some point as it is very logical and gives the trainee multiple options in how they progress from workout to workout.
I am still working on a solid understanding of periodization in general afer buying the book (Practical Programming) and it's myriad programming possibilities.
To me it appears that SDT can have both a workout to workout periodization as well as 4-5 week or both with the varying workouts and then resetting the volume to base with an increased weight and the rebuilding through the use of single, double or triple progression based on any given workout.
Am I understanding this correctly Andalite?
SDT IMO, looks like an excellent method for progressing when you are at the high-intermediate to beginning-advanced stage of your lifting career.
I can see it's use at any stage of training since it's clearly flexible enough that you don't have to necessarily go up in weight the next week if you don't want to or aren't ready and instead do an extra set=more volume=increased homeostasis disruption or just add reps even if only 1 to the first set.
It actually sounds like a very quality lifting theory to base training off of, but I still think that 5x5 is probably superior for a beginning lifter or beginning to mid-level intermediate since straight single progression with the proper workload at this stage is more than sufficient to produce maximal increases in strength at this point in a lifter's career. That and 5x5 as you hit intermediate level can easily be periodized and teach a trainee the simplest form of periodization.
All that said I will probably use that SDT training in the future at some point as it is very logical and gives the trainee multiple options in how they progress from workout to workout.
I am still working on a solid understanding of periodization in general afer buying the book (Practical Programming) and it's myriad programming possibilities.
To me it appears that SDT can have both a workout to workout periodization as well as 4-5 week or both with the varying workouts and then resetting the volume to base with an increased weight and the rebuilding through the use of single, double or triple progression based on any given workout.
Am I understanding this correctly Andalite?