I know how boxers train. I also know how many martial artists train. Like little sissies afraid that they will get huge and slow down by lifting heavy weights.
Sorry pal, knowing a couple boxers trainers names doesn't prove jack shit. Nor does saying go to a boxing gym and see how they train. I have seen how they train, and it is no wonder that they are not pros. Provide some links or don't bother posting. I don't know too many people that trust something they see on a message board by some guy that doesn't even bother to read an article or two. By respected names no less. They are not "Just names on the internet" but cutting edge strength trainers (in the case of Pavel and Staley).
So tell me R- What is the difference between strength training and training for max strength? Does anybody train for mid strength? Sounds pretty gay to me.
Dumb boxer- I am doing some strength training, some weights, plyometrics, ballistic training, ya know, but not for max strength. I know that getting stronger and recruiting more muscle fibers can help with my explosiveness and help me achieve a bigger punch and that strength really helps in the ring, but that magical point where it reaches max strength just doesn't help anymore and hinders me. I try to avoid that magical point that R Crusher on the interenet told me about. Screw that max strength.
It wouldn't surprise me that some of the top boxing trainers that have been at it for years don't train with heavy weights. They probably proscribe to that low weights high reps bullshit. Strength doesn't carry over, according to them, but being able to curl a dumbell 100 times in one set supposedly does.
Yeah, you stick to your "real world" experience then. I am sure I will see your name in lights sometime, what with your "cutting edge" training methods. Cutting edge back in the 50's perhaps.
However an internet isn't real world, and frankly you can be full of shit. Some fat little loser with glasses and a drippy nose that is an "expert" on whatever. Sorry doesn't cut it. I still don't see links or credentials. On the internet, if you have a claim, you provide citations to support your argument. A detailed refutation, explaining why it is so, several links to experts in the field explaining why it is so, and perhaps a few other acessory links to back up their claim as well. Like some physiology. Is that real world enough for you?
Well, in the real world I could look at you, see you fight, or your sucess in training, and gauge how much you know what you are talking about and what kind of sucess you have had with your training methods. On the internet I cannot do that, I go on your argument and what kind of backing your argument has. Which is to say- flashing a few names with the claim that they don't train their boxers with heavy weights. Which I don't believe with just your "word" backing the statement. And you still refuse to post links.
http://www.ringside.com/archives/strength_and_conditioning/weighttraining.htm