His beginner program is not that bad, if you look back at it. He basically suggests you do one working set for each exercise. He wants you to pyramid the weight up each set, until the last set is the heavy one. That sounds a lot like something Mike, and Dorian would preach. In that basic routine, he basically recommends 3 working sets for chest, back, etc, etc, and only 2 for bi's, 2 for tri's. But he does recommend hitting each part 2 times a week to 'start', and then go up to 3 times. The advanced routine however is a bit nuts.
With the current trends of working your body parts 2 or even 3 times a week, and even programs like HST suggesting morning and night workouts, maybe Arnold wasn't that crazy (when he did the am pm thing, it was called the double split). That basic routine with just three work sets for most bodyparts, 2 or 3 times a week, isn't too far off from some current programs. And all the lifts are basic compound movements.
I think a lot of people make the mistake of seeing 5 sets of this or that, and think they mean 5 work sets. As others like DC have pointed out, usually the pro's only do one work set per exercise, but they count their warm ups. Some people get confused, and thats when things get unclear. Arnold cleary states in his book, that you pyriamid the weight up each set, it sounds just like what we do in programs like DC, HST, etc. Warm ups, then your work set.
Well, all that aside, you see a lot of people say Arnold didn't know what he was doing, the people back then had no clue etc, etc. I think they knew just how to build their bodies perfectly. Massive muscles, tiny waist's (ever notice today's bodybuilders not only have guts, but the waist is wide. even someone like Dexter, who has no gut, but a small waist, it's awfully thick from a side view), ripped all year round. Sure they had the drugs, but from what people like Nelson, Realgains, etc post, it was nothing like today. Heck nothing like what some of us on the boards use. Maybe it's time we all start showing some respect for champions, who were obviously doing something right.
