frorider6
New member
I was in the grocery store this weekend, killing time while my girlfriend bought a birthday card. Anyway, I ws browsing one of the muscle magazines and saw an article about Smith Machine squatting. From what I read of the article, it said a study was done with electrical impulse sensors attached to the muscles of people doing squats with a Smith Machine and those with free weights. The only difference found was in the muscles of the lower leg; a bit of the calf muscle and the one on the front of the shin. The quads, glutes and hams were the same. This difference was proably due to the Smith Machine squat not needing the stabilization.
So, if there is no difference in the stress on the leg muscles (with exception to the calf stabilizers), wouldn't it be better to do squats on the Smith Machine because of the greater safety.
I'm sure this wouldn't apply to powerlifters because of the need to build those stabilizers. But what about for the normal person? Or even the bodybuilder?
So, if there is no difference in the stress on the leg muscles (with exception to the calf stabilizers), wouldn't it be better to do squats on the Smith Machine because of the greater safety.
I'm sure this wouldn't apply to powerlifters because of the need to build those stabilizers. But what about for the normal person? Or even the bodybuilder?