Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

PA1AD or Par Deus question on inj. 4ad and 19nordiol

sO EVEN though methytrienolone, and dht werent prescription drugs they still are considerd commercially avaliable and are on the list
 
w_llewellyn said:


Hey Par,

Actually, as much as I hate to say it, Mikeraz is a little correct here.

Methylation typically = Weaker AR Binding but a highly-extended half-life, which in most cases creates a more biologically active androgen. The most potent are typically C-17aa, however T is NOT the most potent non-c-17AA steroid.

That is why I specified "potency at the receptor" (an injected undecanoate ester, for example, would have a much longer half-life still) -- also don't orals also have positive effects on IGF-1 in the liver...???
 
Par Deus said:


That is why I specified "potency at the receptor" (an injected undecanoate ester, for example, would have a much longer half-life still) -- also don't orals also have positive effects on IGF-1 in the liver...???

The half-life of the T ester is not relevant here, only the half-life of biologically active free test, which is measured to be only a few to several minutes. C-17AA's on the other hand have dramatically longer half-lives (hours) as active agents. Plus methylation usually reduces significantly binding to serum proteins as well, another plus. The most potent steroids tend to be those that have very long half-lives because they are very resistant to metabolism, and bind poorly with serum proteins, yet often do not bind the most actively to the AR.

I think the relationship between steroids and IGF-1 is overrated. The link between estrogen and G6PD is probably more significant in terms of non-AR mediated effects. But it is still technicaly a positive.

- Bill Llewellyn
 
MIKERAZ said:
Like i was saying almsot all the POTENT never marketed aas were methylated

Change that to "the most POTENT never marketed AAS are typically methylated" and it is a correct statement. But when you used this line of thought in you initial argument against 1-testosterone being a potent steroid, you certainly were incorrect.

- Bill Llewellyn
 
MIKERAZ said:
Besides 1-test i dont think there are anymore non-methylated aas that are potent

Knowing that you haven't a clue about the vast majority of the myriad of steroids that had been synthesized over the years, that is a very ignorant statement to make. And also a very incorrect one.

- Bill Llewellyn
 
MIKERAZ said:
So u know of non methylated potent aas that we never heard of?

Yes, but I'm not going to take the time to look up the extensive list of potent non-methylated structures for you. Go to the library, do some research, then we can debate when you know a little bit more of what you are talking about.

- Bill Llewellyn
 
Top Bottom