DaCypher said:
LOL!
Maybe you should claim that HIT is bad and he'll argue our side.
Don't worry about that one. I will never endorse HIT, as I understand it and as I have read it in the various FAQ's. Granted, I do like to argue with Blood&Iron, but, I think, that's more due to the fact that he seems to be an intelligent fellow who always happens to disagree with me. Don't know why, but he does. Thus, as another intelligent fellow, I feel it necessary to engage in a war of wits, brains and training methodologies. Call me crazy, but I think that what I do works best, just as you people think that what you do works best. Will I agree that people's bodies respond differently to different training stimuli? Sure. But, I do think that mine is the best method. Of course, that's just because I have experienced very good results with it. If'n you want, I can outline my personal workouts/training methods. Just to compare/contrast with what you all do. Aside from the fact that I spend 5-6 days and do more sets per bodypart, I think that our training might be very similar. Oops, here I go again giving the impression that I do a HIT style training routine. Dont' think that, you crazy fools!
Back to where I was, don't say that I'm trying to force my views on folks(despite the fact that I'm trying to do that, at least slightly) because you guys do it too. Anyway, DaCypher and Blood&Iron, I do have to say that this has been a very good day for me. I like to converse...uh, argue...with you guys. You're both intelligent and bring up good points and even, much to my chagrin, point out when I have mis-stated or even AHHH! committed a fallacy of logic. Love you dudes! We should do this again.