Why does size not always mean strength?

[coolcolj]

So, CCJ, how do you suggest one goes across CNS training mainly? The 5x5 borders that I believe, yes?

Basically, it seems like there's no reason to do anything but CNS training. So many people have muscle, but just can't utilize what they have. Wouldn't it be great to see a guy with half some other guy's muscle, but twice as much recruitment (if you can put it in such a way) and watch them fight? Oh, so fun, t'would be.

well you have to use heavy weights >85% of 1RM, and weights between 50-70% to train for speed and power. Keep the reps low (under 5 reps, 1-3 is optimal) with long rest periods (above 3 mins, preferably 4-5 mins)
Avoid the pump.

Like Pavel said, many people have the hardware, but they don't have the right software.

 

[PolishHammer1977]

Dont forget about all the morons out there that shoot up on synthol. In their case, size definately DOES NOT mean strength.

I always get a little chuckle out of the "Synthol kings". As is anybody wouldn't recognize the difference.

 

[BodybuildingUniverse]

someone will always be stronger. I think the bottom line is, do you want to squat 600 or just have quads that look like you could? big numbers arent currently on my want list, if I could get away with lighter weights I would...just doesnt work for me though...

 

[Legion Kreinak2]

Scruples...
No, he actually holds the 2nd weakest man title. My other friend is officially the weakest.