Nelson Montana said:
Patronizing? I think you have the wrong word. At any rate, no, I would not be willing to do ANYTHING -- not anything that's obviously harmful at least.
Dude, that study you posted was from 19 fucking fifty two! Maybe you should add some brewers yeast and leeches to the program.
Dude, for someone who acts like they know everything, you are pretty dense. FOr a refresher here is the definition of the word.
pa•tron•ize
Pronunciation: (pA'tru-nIz", pa'-), [key]
—v.t., -ized, -iz•ing.
1. to give (a store, restaurant, hotel, etc.) one's regular patronage; trade with.
2. to behave in an offensively condescending manner toward: a professor who patonizes his students.
3. to act as a patron toward (an artist, institution, etc.); support. Also, esp. Brit.,pa'tron•ise".
I think you fit the criteria for #2
This pretty much sums up a lot of your off the cuff smart assed posts, but that is just how you are.
As far as the date of the study, what does that have to do with the revelvancy of the results.
If you can read, then you must have noticed the significant improvement. Hard to argue with that, even if the study is from the friggin 50's DUDE!
BTW, I think that AAS were invented about the same time, do you not take AAS cuz they been around longer than you have hmmm??