Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Reusing a dart

todoveritas said:
I'm no genius, Troublesome, just better informed than most. In a recent study published (Am J Public Health 2001; 91:636-638) over documented reuse of needles in a two-year period, the risk of infection was 1 in 1 million or less for a single needle stick. I would say that is pretty low.


thats funny dude. yea your more informed than others. LMAO..... the article speaks of being infected with hep b hep c and HIV. it does not refer to getting MRSA, or an abscess. Read before you post bro
 
UkKaReD said:
This might sound really stupid but anyone ever heard of re-using a dart say I injected tuesday and need to inject again saturday? Not sharing just using one that I used a few days ago.


i would soak it in rubbing alcahol for 30min, then rince off with water, then put it in fridge.
 
Fuck, I use 2 darts for every inject; 1 to draw through the rubber on the multi-use vial and one to stick.

Just once I was short on needles and had to use the same one to draw and to stick. Using a dull needle is much more painful than using a fresh one. That alone would convince me never to reuse a dart.

Order from getpinz or innovative research or wherever. If you're afraind your parents or someone else will intercept the package, pay the $50/yr to rent a PO box and you can receive pins and ancillaries worry free.
 
errn247 said:
thats funny dude. yea your more informed than others. LMAO..... the article speaks of being infected with hep b hep c and HIV. it does not refer to getting MRSA, or an abscess. Read before you post bro

Dude, you need to read Sun Tzu lest you get in a pissing contest with a fire hose. There ARE NO double-blind studies on this topic. The point was the risk is low. This article is frequently quoted in medical university morbidity and mortality rounds of being indicative of that point.
 
todoveritas said:
Dude, you need to read Sun Tzu lest you get in a pissing contest with a fire hose. There ARE NO double-blind studies on this topic. The point was the risk is low. This article is frequently quoted in medical university morbidity and mortality rounds of being indicative of that point.

How did they sterilize it in the studies?
 
DonCorleone562 said:
Bros,

Who wants to make a bet that the OP will be making "Is this an abcess" thread in about a month??

Any takers? ;)

lol - just what I was thinking - and dart..WTF? If ur gunna try to fit in with lingo make sure you got more than 14 posts. - lets make that a sticky
 
If all you needed was alcohol and a lighter to sterilize with then why would the manufactory and hospitals spend hundred thousands on autoclaves and ethylene oxide gas sterilization? Would you feel comfortable having surgery with instruments that were cleaned with alcohol and a lighter? No it does not sterilize it only cleans it.

Don't reuse needles it is not worth it.

Perp
 
perp69 said:
If all you needed was alcohol and a lighter to sterilize with then why would the manufactory and hospitals spend hundred thousands on autoclaves and ethylene oxide gas sterilization? Would you feel comfortable having surgery with instruments that were cleaned with alcohol and a lighter? No it does not sterilize it only cleans it.

Don't reuse needles it is not worth it.

Perp

Trying to explain something like that to someone who posts this question is pointless. What they hear from you is like the adults in the old Charley Brown cartoons.
 
Top Bottom