Plunkey

[nangiggles]

It's my personal philosophy post divorce.

I absolutely insist that my wife (or GF, before marriage) live "la vie claire" -- the unobstructed life. My theory (which is working, five years in) is that if you make sure she's got the lowest stress most pleasant life possible, it will pay off in dividends in the bedroom.

I don't need the other stuff. Food can be bought. Housekeepers can be bought too. But there's one thing I really like.

What if u were poor?

Sent from my VM670 using EliteFitness

 

[mrplunkey]

What if u were poor?

Sent from my VM670 using EliteFitness

Then I guess that bitch would need to help me dig out of the hole!

 

[AFeedz]

It's my personal philosophy post divorce.

I absolutely insist that my wife (or GF, before marriage) live "la vie claire" -- the unobstructed life. My theory (which is working, five years in) is that if you make sure she's got the lowest stress most pleasant life possible, it will pay off in dividends in the bedroom.

I don't need the other stuff. Food can be bought. Housekeepers can be bought too. But there's one thing I really like.

To sum that up....

Happy wife, happy life.

 

[mrplunkey]

To sum that up....

Happy wife, happy life.

That's very accurate.

But I'm also bad about not taking any shit either.

Plunkey rules:

1) Be sweet all the time.

2) Give it up a lot.

And don't get me wrong. I play by her rules too. It's not a macho thing -- but I'm really big on (1) and (2).

 

[AFeedz]

That's very accurate.

But I'm also bad about not taking any shit either.

Plunkey rules:

1) Be sweet all the time.

2) Give it up a lot.

And don't get me wrong. I play by her rules too. It's not a macho thing -- but I'm really big on (1) and (2).

It's a good theory. Relationships work if both people are focused on the things the other person needs to be happy, which are seldom the same things they need themselves.

 

[mrplunkey]

It's a good theory. Relationships work if both people are focused on the things the other person needs to be happy, which are seldom the same things they need themselves.

Right.

And what I've noticed is that when one person isn't getting what they want, they often try to give more of that to the other person. In a lot (if not most) cases, the other person isn't even interested in that.

 

[AFeedz]

Right.

And what I've noticed is that when one person isn't getting what they want, they often try to give more of that to the other person. In a lot (if not most) cases, the other person isn't even interested in that.

Agree.

 

[superqt4u2nv]

That's very accurate.

But I'm also bad about not taking any shit either.

Plunkey rules:

1) Be sweet all the time.

2) Give it up a lot.

And don't get me wrong. I play by her rules too. It's not a macho thing -- but I'm really big on (1) and (2).

If your partner treats you well #1 is pretty easy for the most part and #2is also real easy if you feel like your partner treats you right.

 

[mrplunkey]

If your partner treats you well #1 is pretty easy for the most part and #2is also real easy if you feel like your partner treats you right.

You'd be surprised. I've seen a lot of situations where the better the other spouse has it, the more shitty they get.

There's an old saying: "You can get used to any view."

But in general, I agree. If you get (1) in place, everything else should be easy. I'm the beneficiary of that system right now and have been for the last five years.

 

[superqt4u2nv]

You'd be surprised. I've seen a lot of situations where the better the other spouse has it, the more shitty they get.

There's an old saying: "You can get used to any view."

But in general, I agree. If you get (1) in place, everything else should be easy. I'm the beneficiary of that system right now and have been for the last five years.

Aww thats awesome it's working for you.

And yes I agree it's easy for some people to take the other half for granted.