Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

My personal physical fitness war against HIV/AIDS: The War.

Incidently, while you are in Boston, if you do get a phenotype/genotype test, you may want to find out if you have clade C HIV clinical isolate. If this is the case, you should probably not even be on Sustiva because this drug will almost certainly cause the development of a high level resistance mutation, V106M, at codon 106. If V106M resistance develops, this means that you will have high level resistance to ALL of the NNRTIs, not just Sustiva. The reverse, however, has not been demonstrated--pressure to develop V106M resistance has only been shown in clade C isolates in the pressence of Sustiva not the other NNRTIs. This information was updated by the International Aids Society in March 2003 along with the addition of the first multi-resistance bar for the NNRTIs at V106M. Just another possible reason to discuss getting off of Sustiva with your doc and substituting with a different NNRTI-that is if V106M resistance has not already occurred. Also, consider that the rather SERIOUS depression issue associated with Sustiva is not particularly associated with the other NNRTIs (delavirdine or nevirapine) either. Just more food for thought.
 
In your original post, you said:
"For antiretorvirals, I am taking the following: Combivir as AZT & 3TC (YES, I know AZT is poison, but it works for me.) Sustiva, and Viread. I take Effoxor ex for depression and will be soon changing it to Mirtazapine. Prochorperazine for nausea, Trazdone for sleep, and Avandia for appitiate. "

Sorry to keep posting but I am still pondering why you are on this combination? I feel like whatever physician(s) that put you on this combination really missed the boat on several very serious issues and has gotten caught in the "medical rut" of just treating and chasing symptoms rather than looking at the whole of the situation--especially "quality of life" issues and cause and effect, not to mention the potentially life threatening depression which is a listed side effect of Sustiva. And this is actually a very easy problem to get caught up into over time as most physcians are very overworked in this field and do not have a lot of time to consider your individual situation. So it is really up to you to point out what is going well and what is wrong. You have to learn to work WITH your HIV practitioner. It seems to me that you are overdue for a complete re-evaluation of all of your clincal symptoms, overall health, anti-HIV therapy, hormonal replacement therapy, anti-wasting therapy, body compostion analysis, etc.

Did your doctor ever consider taking you off of combivir and putting you on two times per day epivir @ 150 mg/tab PLUS Viread PLUS an NNRTI other than Sustiva?

Sorry to tell you this but AZT is NOTORIOUS for gastrointestinal problems and causing loss of appetite--considerable more so than any other NRTI. Aside from the fact that it is also quite suppressive of bone marrow (which is why you should probably be on 200 mg/week of Deca while on AZT). It is also THE MOST likely source of your nausea and lack of appetite out of everything you are taking BY FAR and if it is causing any significant degree of bone marrow suppression in you, it will also cause a significant degree of general fatigue or lack of energy as well.

Also since Viread, Epivir and AZT are all essentially in the same class of drug (viread being very slightly different) and therefore the mode of action is similar, it can also be expected that similar side effects are most probably additive as the mechanisms for causing them are most likely also similar (I am treating this from a basic toxicological aspect). The AZT is the MOST TOXIC of those three drugs but does not necessarily suppress the virus to any greater degree than the others so my STRONG gut reaction is that AZT is the one I would remove from the combination considering this from a viewpoint of benefits to side effects. Dropping the AZT MIGHT allow you to drop taking the anti-nausea medication and the appetite stimulant medication after enough time has elapsed for the AZT to clear out of your system and your system reaclimates.

The other change I can not stress considering strongly enough is substituting the Sustiva with a different NNRTI. This would certainly allow you to sleep better and may actually allow you to drop the Trazadone and eventually ween off of anti-depressants over time as well. My gut reaction is that you are overmedicated to be honest. I think changing your basic anti-retroviral therapy may help you make these deletions. Often, less is better. Remember, the more prescription medications you are on, the more likely it becomes to have cross drug interactions and increased side effects across the board. The chances of "nonlisted" side effects also increases due to combinations of interacting drugs as this is something that is virtually impossible to anticipate during the studies performed to determine side effects and safety when first seeking FDA approval of the medication. One other thing to remember is that the depression caused by Sustiva often becomes life threatening. It is not uncommon for people on Sustiva to have suicide ideation and this is not to be taken lightly. Remind your doctor that Sustiva is CONTRA-INDICATED for people showing signs of depression.

You should also consider that by being on three NRTIs and one NNRTI, I still don't see how you are accomplishing anything more than a three drug combo of two NRTIs and one NNRTI such as a combination of Epivir, Viread and a different NNRTI than Sustiva, preferably Viramune which has been shown to be equally potent and durable as Sustiva. Delavirdine would be my second choice. But then again, I don't know what your viral load or T-cells are, your drug history, or what your CBC or Chems look like and I don't have any resistance pattern information about you either. So just more stuff to discuss with your physician.

Since you are going to your physician tomorrow, you need to discuss getting the basic stuff that he can help you with in order of priorities. That means that you need to focus on getting your basic HIV anti-retroviral medications straightened out first so that you can move to cut out all unnecessary prescription medications as your system readjusts. Then you also need to getting testing done as suggested in my previous posts to help straighten out your hormonal situation and check your lipid situation and work with your physician to establish appropriate hormone replacement therapy for you. Then you need to get some body compostion testing done (Bio-Impedence Analysis) so you can establish a baseline for evaluating the efficacy of your anti-wasting therapy/medications which you should absolutely be on with HIV disease.

One of the many problems with most HIV physicians is that many are adamant about NOT changing your anti-retroviral therapy if it is working to control your viral load and your T-Cells appear to be "ok." This is very myopic and does not consider the whole of the situation or quality of life. It also very badly underestimates such things as the very real danger posed by depression induced by Sustiva in particular. If your physician is of this mindset, I would strongly suggest you find another HIV practioner--one that will work WITH you as well as one that is extremely knowledgeable. Just a word of advice.
 
In your original post you said:
"It should be know that I was previously on Oxandrin but had liver failure on it and had to stop taking it."

OOOPPPSS, I have to admit that I totally missed that. How long were you on oxandrin for and at what dosage? Did you develop Peliosis Hepatis (blood filled cysts) or any kind of liver cell tumors? Did you develop jaundice? Do you have previous liver damage from alcohol or drug use? I had assumed that you do not have chronic hep C because of the anti-retroviral medications that you are on and the fact that your physician should have screened you for this as a matter of practice before prescribing them. Am I still safe in assuming no hep C? In the absence of any SPECIFICS, I would be VERY concerned about you doing ANY oral anabolic steroids (which are typically 17-alkylated) in light of this including the dbol, even at the low dosage that you indicated. I would also avoid (injectible) Winstrol Depot as it is also a 17-alkylated anabolic steroid.

Just for your information, my current HIV physician was involved in several of the clinical and safety studies of anabolic steroids in HIV patients. He has admitted that he has not seen any instances of liver toxicity from injectible testosterone (cypionate or enanthate--US pharmaceutical made, of course) or nandrolone decanoate so these should be alright, certainly at the doses that typically would be prescribed for HIV patients--which I mentioned before are typically 200 mg/week for nandrolone decanoate and 100-200 mg/every one or two weeks (depending on your blood tests and clinical evaluation by your physician) of injectible testosterone, although I am aware that this is sometimes prescribed as high as 400 mg/week for HIV patients. But like I said, it is a highly individual matter based on appropriate lab work and your physician's clinical evaluation of its efficacy--i.e. observing to see if you still exhibit symptoms of low testosterone even if you are in the "normal range" as there are hormonal resistance issues with many people with HIV which means that "normal" levels may not generate a "normal" response as it would in someone that is HIV negative. There are quite a few physicians that have observed that "high normal" range (total blood testosterone levels above 700 ng/dl) may be more appropriate for people with long term HIV or people that have been previously diagnosed with full blown AIDS. Again it is a clinical and professional judgement call that you need to discuss with your physician.
 
I have been told by my Psych doctor to drop the Mirtazapine he prescribed and to go it for awhile without any anti-depression meds to see if it helps and to see about the effects of Sustiva. The reason that i've been on Sustiva is that I received great benefit from it when used with Effoxor EX. I had good, positive dreams on it and a good nights sleep on it. Also, the one pill a day helps with my high pill burden. So we shall see in the next couple of days how my sleep and other things work out. Thanks esp. to NorCalBdyBldr for his advice. Well, time for me to go see my AS and Test doc. Will give a report tonight. Thanks!
 
An update on my visit with my AS and Test Doctor. He has written a script for me for Carnitor now, as well as all the other stuff I get from him. I had my Blood tested for total and free Test and will give you all the results when they get back from the lab. I am now also off all Psych meds to see just what is needed to be done in order for me to be able to continue to take Sustiva without the possible negative side effects. I have also decided that the easiest way for me to make my crunches harder, that I am going to put the crunch board up one peg higher for the next week and see how it goes. I finally got something like a decent night's sleep and am ready to go back to the gym today. It's an arm day (UGH!) but i'll get through it. Will answer more of the previous comments later today. Thanks!
 
Hi Alanchiras
In your recent post, you said:
“I have been told by my Psych doctor to drop the Mirtazapine he prescribed and to go it for awhile without any anti-depression meds to see if it helps and to see about the effects of Sustiva. The reason that i've been on Sustiva is that I received great benefit from it when used with Effoxor EX. I had good, positive dreams on it and a good nights sleep on it. Also, the one pill a day helps with my high pill burden.”

In your original post, you stated that you were being removed from Effexor EX and being placed on Mirtazapine. By your own admission, you have been suffering from depression (no need to hang head in shame, by the way). I suspect that you have not been doing as well in the depression department as you believed your were on the Effexor EX since your psychiatrist was removing you from Effexor EX and putting you on a different anti-depressant, Mirtazapine. If you were doing well, then why would he change your medication unless you were having some other adverse physical reaction to the Effexor EX? Now, you are planning on not using ANY anti-depressants but ARE continuing on with the Sustiva (which if not THE source of your depression is LIKELY to be contributing to it in a significant way). Let me reiterate, depression in conjunction with Sustiva should not be taken lightly. This is a VERY SERIOUS matter. Numerous people have committed suicide on this drug and, yes, it was attributed to the Sustiva. I personally know several that either succeeded or attempted it while taking Sustiva. I do not know if you have a history of depression or when it “appeared.” So, again, considering my ignorance of the specifics of your situation (and that is why you need to discuss this thoroughly with your physician AND psychiatrist), I would like to point out several things that are KNOWN about Sustiva although the original studies that led to its approval were a little “premature” being that it was fast-tracked through FDA under the shortened approval process.

First, the ratio of REM sleep to deep sleep is skewed. You are likely getting FIVE times more REM sleep than you would under normal conditions—don’t believe me? Have your physician prescribe a “sleep study” for you and find out for yourself. Secondly, you will also be likely getting almost NO deep sleep of any significance. This means, at best, you have VERY “abnormal” sleep. Common sense alone would indicated that this is NOT a good thing and would also tend to counter your perception that you have “good positive dreams on Sustiva and a good nights sleep on it.” Most people that I know have described the dreams as being everything from blood curdling screaming yourself awake while profusely sweating full blown and horrible nightmares at the one extreme to being akin to “dropping acid” for those that have used and are familiar with the effects of LSD, to “vivid and unsettling dreams” to just “vivid dreams with extreme color” on the milder end. EVERYONE reports LOTS of dreams--WAY beyond anything considered normal. The ONLY people that I have ever known that actually LIKE the dreams tend to be people that are artists or graphic designers as they are typically very visual people and get into the vividness and interesting “Technicolor” of the dreams. Most people find them “disturbing” or “unsettling.” I have never heard anyone (until you) claim that they actually “got a good nights sleep on Sustiva.” Most seem to suffer from some form of fatigue (probably BECAUSE of the lack of restful sleep). In any case, the abnormal sleep pattern alone induced by Sustiva simply CANNOT be a good thing over the long haul—common sense alone would tell you this.

Secondly, as for pill burden, this is understandable. This is THE bane of all that are under treatment for HIV. As I said, I suspect that you are being overmedicated and you definitely need to discuss this situation with your physician. That being said, I would be extremely concerned about you being removed from an anti-depressant without removal from the most likely CAUSE or strongest CONTRIBUTER of the depression in the first place, the Sustiva. This is a brain chemistry effect caused by the Sustiva, which does, in fact, cross the blood-brain barrier. Although the original studies reported the incidences of serious depression from Sustiva as significant, they also tended to minimize them and still do compared with clinical “real world” observations. Real world experience and follow up information now indicates that this was terribly understated. The depression inducing effects of Sustiva are almost legendary. And frankly, the reason why the FDA hasn't issued a "black box warning" regarding Sustiva and psychiatric disorders is probably more a matter of political influence, marketing and politics than it is of science. Also, depending on what version you are prescribed, Sustiva is usually administered as three capsules once per day or one tablet once per day. Viramune, on the other hand is administered as one tablet two times per day so I don’t think this should unreasonably impact your daily pill burden. It may also allow you to withdraw from the anti depressant AND your sleeping aid, the Trazadone so you would be taking TWO less medications overall since Viramune does not impact sleep patterns the way that Sustiva does.

And if you don’t believe me, here are some excerpts from the 2003 Physician’s Deck Reference concerning Sustiva:

“Psychiatric Symptoms: Serious psychiatric adverse experiences have been reported in patients treated with SUSTIVA.”

It further states that specific incidences of severe psychiatric events include severe depression, suicidal ideation, nonfatal suicide attempts, aggressive behavior, paranoid reaction and manic reactions by percentages. It then goes on to state:

“Patients with a history of psychiatric disorders appear to be at greater risk of these serious psychiatric adverse experiences”...

It further states:

...”There have also been occasional post-marketing reports of death by suicide, delusions and psychosis-like behavior, although a causal relationship to the use of SUSTIVA cannot be determined from these reports. Patients with serious psychiatric adverse experiences should seek immediate medical evaluation to assess the possibility that the symptoms may be related to the use of SUSTIVA, and if so, to determine whether the risks of continued therapy outweigh the benefits (see ADVERSE REACTIONS ).”

Remember, there are usually many options on how to control your viral load. If you are experiencing negative side effects from one treatment regimen then it is best to explore OTHER options. Depression is a serious quality of life issue that can also become life threatening. I simply CANNOT state this any more strongly with this drug. It works extremely well for MANY people BUT should NEVER be used in ANYONE with a history of substance abuse, depression or anyone experiencing symptoms of depression while on it. If you are experiencing depression, it will not resolve while on this drug so you should be removed from it ASAP and a different anti-retroviral substituted. I do not know of a single case where anti-depressants could resolve depression caused by Sustiva either. Substitution with a different anti-retroviral represents your best available option to be honest.
 
The only reason that i've been taken off Effoxor EX is because of belt-tighting on Beacon Hill, that MassHealth will no longer cover it because of the high cost. My Psych doc is trying to find a substuite drug to replace the Effexor that works as well for me that will be covered by my insurance company. While I was on Effexor EX and Sustiva I had done very welll on it. My depression actually came out of bad side effects from the substitute drug. Now that for the first time in twelve years I am off all anti-depressant meds, it will be a good time to reassess my mental health - with the Sustiva too. If I have to come off Sustiva, I will do it; but we are hoping to identify my current real-life reaction to not being on any Psych meds and then it will be clearer to myself and my Psych doc as to how to go about attacking my lifelong depression. I DO hear you loud and clear about the risks to my mental health with Sustiva. We are well aware of it and are working with the situation from day to day. For example, it may be just a little maina that i'm feeling now, but I finally fell that I can handle going to the gym today - and it's my hardest day for me (arms.) My viral load has been very low but not yet undetectable, so that's why the highly odd four drug regiem. I have been told that I can drop one of the drugs when I become undetectiable (<25). I have been one of the lucky ones - I could fill a book with the great, positive dreams that Sustiva has given me. It actually makes me look forward to go to bed. I know this is not the case will all users, I am one of the lucky ones. It also helpes keep me away from taking any Protease Inhibitors, so I can save that option for use in the future. Well, off to the YMCA I go. Will have some lab results later tonight or Thur at the latest (no CD4 or viral load until next week.) Thanks to all that are concern. ---You know, there is a line from the Pet Shop Boys cover of the Village People song Go West. It says that we will learn and teach. It does seem that we all are doing a lot of that with this thread. Thanks.
 
Here are my lab results:

COMPLETE BLOOD COUNT (BLOOD)

DATE
WBC
4.0-11.0
K/uL
RBC
4.6-6.2
m/uL
Hgb
14.0-18.0
g/dL
Hct
40-52
%
MCV
82-98
fL
MCH
27-32
pg
MCHC
31-35
%
RDW
10.5-15.5
%

07/22/03 2:01P
5.3
3.51*
14.3
41.3
118*
40.8*
34.7
15.8*

BASIC COAGULATION (BLOOD)

DATE
PT
11.3-13.3
sec
PT Mean

sec
PTT
22.0-35.0
sec
PTT Mea

sec
Plt Smr

Plt Ct
150-440
K/uL
BLEED T
2-8
MINUTES
FIBRINO
200-400
MG/DL
FSP
0-10
UG/ML
INR(PT)

MPV
7.2-9.4
fL
LPlt

PltClmp


07/22/03 2:01P





334








ENZYMES & BILIRUBIN (BLOOD)

DATE
ALT
0-40
IU/L
AST
0-40
IU/L
LD(LDH)
94-250
IU/L
CK(CPK)
38-174
IU/L
AlkPhos
39-117
IU/L
Amylase
0-100
IU/L
TotBili
0-1.5
mg/dL
DirBili
0-.3
mg/dL
IndBili

mg/dL

07/22/03 2:01P (2)
55*
HEMOLYSIS FALSELY ELEVATES ALT(SGPT)
54*
HEMOLYSIS FALSELY ELEVATES AST


55

0.4



(2) Lipemic Specimen; Slightly Hemolyzed

OTHER ENDOCRINE (BLOOD)

DATE
Cortsol
2-20
ug/dL
11-DOC
0-.12
ug/dL
Aldost

ng/dL
Renin

ng/mL/hr
Testost
280-800
ng/dL
FreeTes
7.2-23.0
pg/mL
DHEA-SO
88.9-427
ug/dL

07/22/03 4:15P





PND


07/22/03 2:01P (4)




323



(4) Lipemic Specimen; Slightly Hemolyzed

Hope this all formats right on this site. Well, anything to worry about?
 
Hi Alan,
It was nice chatting with you a while ago. If I recall, you said your total testosterone is around 323 dl/ng out of a laboratory reference range of 280-800. This barely puts you in the low side of "normal" which is NOT going to cut it for HIV. This is inspite of the fact that you are on Androgel "replacement" therapy. I pretty much would have assumed that or worse. For me, Androgel at 10 grams per day has been demonstrated time and again to only raise blood total testosterone levels about 50 dl/ng. which is practically nothing. It is about enough to take the "edge" off of a low testosterone headache but not enough to make it go away. So forget about being able to realistically gain or hold on to lean mass on that. It simply is NOT enough to pull you through the long haul.

To be honest, you should strive to keep your testosterone levels above at least 500 ng/dl, even at the NADIR. You have to remember that you are not only trying to replace testosterone to approximately mid-range normal levels which in your case the midpoint of the lab reference range is 550 ng/dl but also you are working against a disease that is catabolic by nature.

Remember, with HIV infection, your body is greatly impaired in its ability to metabolize fat and therefore, if you get "knocked down" with any kind of illness, your immune system goes right for the protein stores (metabolic lean body mass--muscle and organ tissue) which it would do to some degree even in HIV negative folks but additionally, while sick your body will burn your lean mass for fuel as well since it really can't burn fat well enough to use in this situation. What is even worse than this is that once the illness is over and you return to "baseline" HIV infection, your body will sense the loss of lean body mass and treat it like starvation. This means that you will have an added propenstity to convert sugars and starches that you eat to fat and store them as fat which you can't use. Physicians that do not measure and track body compostional changes with time but only weigh you on a scale may not even realize that wasting is going on because your overall body weight may not be changing at all but your percentage of bodyfat is increasing and your lean mass is wasting away. And this can be occurring for a couple of years before it becomes obvious to your health care provider if they are only using a scale.

On top of this, your body is fighting a "permanent" infection which your system is not designed to do so it becomes a problem of chronic depletion. This is why wasting it common in HIV positive patients even if they have undectable viral loads. There are studies that show the immune system of a typical person with HIV clears between 1-2 billion viral particles per day throughout the entire course of the disease. This means there is an abnormally high protein expenditure and the whole process is catabolic. So to help counteract this and return the nitrogen balance to a more favorable condition, you need some anabolic therapy as well as higher than "normal" testosterone levels. You are not dealing with "normal" conditions by any means. You will absolutely need to supplement higher than normal amounts of protein to protect the protein that you have as well as add any as well. However, the combination of HIV meds which are liver toxic and strong protein binding androgens like testosterone in combination with heavy protein supplementation can cause some serious "clearance problems" for the liver as well. Remember, you are not dealing with normal conditions. As a result, even on androgens, I would not exceed 2 grams of protein per pound of bodyweight per day and would probably be inclined to keep it more like 1 gram per pound of total bodyweight in your case since you have already had liver problems. And don't worry about what the competitive bodybuilders that you read about do. Your situation is completely different and there are a lot of additional considerations to take into account.

Further, there tends to be some general hormonal resistance issues with HIV that means that "normal" testosterone levels are not as effective in an HIV positive person as they would be in someone that is HIV negative as I discussed above in previous posts. So considering that, it is not surprising that some doctors have found that total testosterone levels below 700 ng/dl do not work well or at all in many HIV positive patients. It is also common for people with HIV to exhibit clinical symptoms of low testosterone (as I discussed in previous posts above) at levels certainly below 500 ng/dl or even at higher levels which will come as quite a shock to doctors not experienced in dealing with this issue directly. There is an interesting article that makes this case on www.medibolics.com and one of the doctors involved in the study was Doctor Judith Radkin, I believe out of New York State. Personally, it has been my own observation that levels below this do not work very well either but this is a strictly anecdotal, rather that strictly scientific observation, based on my own lab work and compared with the lab work of quite a few others. However, I have seen and experienced enough to suggest that this is fairly accurate as I have been heavily involved in this issue since about 1995 when I suffered a major "knockdown event" and lost 30 lbs.--I dropped from 227 lbs to 197 lbs and had never used any anabolic substance before in my life. My testosterone levels had fallen off the bottom of the chart also and that was the beginning of a long fight to get replacement therapy when it was not "popular" (not like it is now either but it was considered pretty far out there back then). I finally insisted on doing it "the scientific way" and making a change, letting things stabilize and then testing to see what the result was as a reasonable approach that I was able to get my physician on board with as logical.

As a recap there are three issues to consider, HIV is catabolic by nature, general hormonal resistance issues that seems to get worse with time of infection and treatment, and hormonal replacement. So you need for your doctor to learn to think outside of the box in terms of hormones as this goes beyond strict replacement and is also trying to deal with the other issues as well. You can cycle above, on and off, of the replacement amount but should always maintain your basic testosterone replacement therapy as the cornerstone of your anti-wasting program.

In your case, there is one additional consideration. Since you are probably ill advised to use any oral steroids which are all 17 alkylated and you have had problems with oxandrin already (Anadrol is the only other oral one approved in the US for HIV anti-wasting therapy and is a lot harsher because it is dosed MUCH higher than Oxandrin), I would think it reasonable for your physician to allow you to be dosed a little higher than normal to account for the fact that you can not be taking these for anti wasting therapy. In your case, you should be using testosterone and deca as your primary anti-wasting medications since you really don't have many other legal options (Serostim, although approved for anti-wasting therapy, is NOT very good for gaining much lean body mass and is tremendously expensive so the clinical benefit versus the cost and high side effects makes it a poor choice overall but it does have its specific uses but those are outside of what I am trying to cover here). The cost of testosterone is actually quite reasonable in terms of its benefit versus cost so overall it is a very good choice.

Any dose of testosterone prescribed above what you need for replacement should be used for 8-12 week "cycles" above your replacement dose with an equal time off. However, your doctor can not prescribe in a "cyclical manner" as this is not considered theraputic and could get him cross-wise with the State Medical Licensing Board. So he should consider your "on-cycle" dose as well as your standard dose and write a standing scrip for the total. You then take your standard replacement dose and "save up" the extra until you have gone 8-12 weeks and have enough "extra" to cycle above the standard dose. Believe it or not, there are some physicians that know that this is what their patients are doing and are ok with it as there is a genuine theraputic benefit in increasing lean mass. Also some studies have shown a lessoning of a host of other metabolic related problems like lipodystrophy with increased testosterone levels in HIV positive patients as well.

But first things first as this is a process. You need to first figure out what the proper dose for replacment is by trying a dose, say 100 mg/week and then say come back in one month and if you are due for an injection on Friday evening, get your level tested on Friday afternoon (at the NADIR--lowest anticipated level) before you get your shot. Then, based on the lab results, your physician may be justified in upping the dosage to say 200 mg/week or whatever he feels will put you in the target range. Once you are in the target range, he needs to observe you clinically, which he should be doing all along, and determine if you are still showing signs of low testosterone, like fatigue, depression, headaches, etc. and fine tune adjust accordingly. After the replacment dosage is established, then you can discuss with him the possibility of "a bit more" for the purpose of minor cycles to increase lean body mass so you can establish a buffer as this can be VERY important to have this protein reserve in case you get sick.

So I hope this helps. Once again, this is very long.
 
Top Bottom