Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Kevin Sites is a Piece of Shit

chesty

Bodybuilding Competitor
Elite Moderator
This mother fucking cocksucker is the biggest piece of shit on the planet. He is doing everything he can to get this Marine to hang! He doesn't have any idea what he is talking about and should not be making any statements about anything. I hope this gay ass liberal piece of shit dies. Yeah, that's right chesty is pissed off! I hate the fucking press and I hate the fact that they are allowed to go into war with us! Their shit should be sensored before they go public with it.

War is not like walking down the street in some US city as a cop. They have no idea what it is like and for this grabastic balless shit smoker to be saying these things is undermining our Marines and Soldiers on the ground as well as nailing the lid shut on this Marines life.

Witness: Shot Iraqi Didn't Move
Monday, November 22, 2004

PHOTOS VIDEO

Click image to enlarge
STORIES BACKGROUND LINKS
•Iraq Vote Set for Jan. 30; Cleric Killed in Mosul•Military Probes Prisoner Shooting•Video Catches Marine Shooting Injured Enemy•Marines Mindful of Muslim Rules
BAGHDAD, Iraq — The NBC correspondent who filmed the fatal shooting by a Marine of an apparently injured and unarmed Iraqi by a U.S. Marine inside a Fallujah (search) mosque has written on his Web site that the wounded man made no sudden movements before the Marine opened fire on him.

Before the opening of the Nov. 8 assault on the rebel-held city, Marine commanders told infantrymen that the rules of engagement allowed for use of deadly force against men of military age deemed holding hostile intent, even if the enemy didn't fire on the Marines first.

In a posting on his Web blog dated Sunday, Kevin Sites (search), a freelancer on assignment for NBC, wrote that he didn't see the wounded Iraqi make any movement before the Marine shot him — but that only the Marine can explain his mental state before the shooting.

"Through my viewfinder I can see him (Marine) raise the muzzle of his rifle in the direction of the wounded Iraqi. There are no sudden movements, no reaching or lunging," Sites writes.

"However, the Marine could legitimately believe the man poses some kind of danger. Maybe he's going to cover him while another Marine searches for weapons. Instead, he pulls the trigger. There is a small splatter against the back wall and the man's leg slumps down," Sites writes.


"'Well he's dead now,"' says another Marine in the background.

"I was not watching from a hundred feet away. I was in the same room," Sites writes. "Aside from breathing, I did not observe any movement at all."

"I can't know what was in the mind of that Marine," the posting reads. "He is the only one who does."

The U.S. military is investigating the Nov. 13 incident by a member of the 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Division, footage of which has been broadcast worldwide, inflaming anti-American passions in the Arab world and among Iraq's Sunni minority.

Military investigators also are looking into whether more than one wounded insurgent was shot in the mosque. Two other men visible on the NBC video appear to be suffering from what the network described in a broadcast as fresh and fatal gunshot wounds.

The shooting occurred when a Marine unit entered the mosque and found five men wounded in fighting at the site the day before, when another Marine unit clashed with gunmen apparently using the mosque to fire from, according to Sites' broadcast.

In the video, as the cameraman moved into the mosque, a Marine can be heard shouting obscenities in the background, yelling that one of the men was only pretending to be dead. The Marine then raises his rifle toward an Iraqi lying on the floor of the mosque and shoots the man.

Two other men are seen slumped by a wall. Sites' account said the men, who were hurt in the previous day's attack, had been shot again by the Marines.

Earlier in the footage, as the Marine unit that Sites was accompanying approached the mosque, gunfire can be heard from inside.

Sites writes in his Web diary that the Marine, angry moments before firing, quickly became apologetic when he realized the incident had been caught on camera.

"The Marine who fired the shot became aware that I was in the room. He came up to me and said, 'I didn't know sir — I didn't know.' The anger that seemed present just moments before turned to fear and dread."

Sites — a well-built, goateed man who jogged around U.S. military bases near Fallujah that frequently come under mortar and rocket attack — wrote that perceptions of him as an agitator for peace are incorrect.

"This week I've even been shocked to see myself painted as some kind of anti-war activist. Anyone who has seen my reporting on television or has read the dispatches on this Web site is fully aware of the lengths I've gone to play it straight down the middle — not to become a tool of propaganda for the left or the right."

Sites wrote that he considered destroying tape of the incident, rather than sharing it with the pool that shared footage among networks covering the fight in Fallujah.

"I considered not feeding the tape to the pool — or even, for a moment, destroying it. But that thought created the same pit in my stomach that witnessing the shooting had ... I would be faced with the fact that I had betrayed truth as well as a life supposedly spent in pursuit of it."
 
Bor, he's doing what reporters are supposed to do, report what he saw. He even considered destroying evidence, but he did the right thing.
Props to the reporter for standing up.
 
not just that, chesty, if you stayed true to what you say you believe, that its worth some marines lives to achieve the mission, the US should crucify this soldier. his life (or death) isnt worth the negative sentiment throughout the arab world.

if you were that soldier, and had the choice, would you stand up and accept the death penalty, if you knew that if you didnt do it, the war would last an extra year, at a cost of 50 US lives? seriously. yes or no, id like to hear your response.
 
The press compromises the safety of our military more often than not. Remember Mr. Rivera? Field reporters only care about one thing... being the next big story with their face on the cover of Newsweek. Who cares if what they print ends up costing the life of a soldier who was just doing his job. Show me a reporter that actually cares about 'doing the right thing' and I'll find you a politician who doesn't lie. :mad:
 
I don't get it. It's POLICY to shoot blindly at any injured enemy soldier who even moves?

I'm pretty sure what he did there was *not* accordingly to the rules of US Army combat or his training.

At worst, he should get a $75 fine. :)
 
GoldenDelicious said:
not just that, chesty, if you stayed true to what you say you believe, that its worth some marines lives to achieve the mission, the US should crucify this soldier. his life (or death) isnt worth the negative sentiment throughout the arab world.

if you were that soldier, and had the choice, would you stand up and accept the death penalty, if you knew that if you didnt do it, the war would last an extra year, at a cost of 50 US lives? seriously. yes or no, id like to hear your response.

The soldier did the right thing. An enemy faking is dangerous. It's war my friend and war is ugly by definition. The best way to end up this shit is to use the same tools as your enemy. Arabs will hate the US no matter what. Just my 0.02.... :)
 
manny78 said:
The soldier did the right thing. An enemy faking is dangerous. It's war my friend and war is ugly by definition. The best way to end up this shit is to use the same tools as your enemy. Arabs will hate the US no matter what. Just my 0.02.... :)
lol i know, what i was doing was testing chesty's beliefs

war is by neccessity quite machiavallian, and in this case, the soldiers conviction would help the US no doubt. just wanted to see what chesty would do if faced with such a choice. good test of patriotism
 
I don't see anything wrong with the reporter's actions. How could he have no idea what was going on when HE WAS RIGHT FUCKING THERE? Jesus H. Christ.
 
Cause he wasn't there to report news he was there to get his prize winning story. He should not have made any public comments. Have turned the film over to investigators if he believed a crime was committed.

This reporter was not around when the day before that Marine got a face full of shrapnel and saw his fellow Marine turned into salsa by the very same faking. Oh I am wounded help me. Next thing there putting this Marine into glad sandwhich bags.

This reporter doesnt' care about the Marines or what we are there for. If he was a real American. He would not do stuff to help inflame the Arabs against us and he would equally call out condemnation to the butchery of the terrorists.

No where did I see or say this Marine should take one for the greater cause. He did his job as I would have done. Plain and simple. Having reporters in your unit is always a bad thing.

As a cop you learn about perception. You can have 5 different peopel watch an accident occur and you will get five different versions. Just because he was there doesnt' make him a good witness or a witness at all. Did he see the hands of the terrorist? Did he see his face? He saw a leg move and some blood. How does that equate to seeing the no movement?

You don't have to test my convictions,morals etc. I would do the same thing he did no questions asked.

Again, I stand on my initial statements. Kevins Sites is a piece of shit. Thought about destroying evidence? Who the fuck is he trying to fool? He only said that to further hype the story.
 
Top Bottom