Im 2.8% bf, is this possible?

[Bam Bam]

I am a fitness model therefore I have to maintain a low bf % year round. I went earlier and got tested with calipers just for shits and giggles. I was thinking 5 or 6% at the most. The first test was 3.3% and the second was lower. It averaged out to be 2.8%. My lower abs are still lagging however. Surely that test isn't all that accurate. I was tested with digital calipers. What do you guy's think? Bam

 

[IronMind-]

well bam. all i have to say is damn!
do you get a cold often? lol j/p Congrats on being one cut mofo!

Later
-IronMind

 

[edmass]

Dunno bout digital calipers. But with normal calipers I tested 3.6% ...a few weeka ago, getting ready for first comp. The readings were 5or6mm abs....1mm chest....6or7mm thigh.
I could see someone being lower but my abs and obliques were ripped..I'm talking veins running from lower ab to chest.

 

[solidg]

pics please

 

[jloflexin405]

Bump for PICS.

 

[onerepmaximum]

I have no faith at all in digital calipers. Too many variables will influence it big time.

 

[onerepmaximum]

Hey Bam Bam, did you compete in or go watch the state champs in Jackson?

 

[brunette]

bam bam did you ever get your bf confirmed?

 

[mposster]

there are so many different formulas to get bodyfay %
its really a bias test, i would really use it only for tracking progress for fat loss
let the same person check everysingle time , and the most acurate formula is a 9 site test pec,scapula,bi,tri,iliac,ab,kidney,thigh, and calve.
the lowest i have ever seen i an amature bodybuilder was 5.8% and he won the masters national as a middleweight.....striated glutes and low back...freaky

 

[Dial_tone]

I only trust hydrostatic so far.