If Romney gets the nod

[binö]

Boo Hoo.

R: I can't believe you call people names, you libtard fuck.
D: I can't believe you call people names, you right wing red neck.

The problem with our country and government has nothing to do with who's president right now or who will be next year, because nothing is going to get fixed no matter who our supposed leader is when the real problem is that both sides are overflowing with extremists and adopting radical views in an effort to be as different from the other as possible. The problem is both sides are so busy hating the other side, they've become more focused on discrediting and beating their competitors... and it's not because either side cares anymore about the country, our beliefs or what's best, it's because they want to say their side won.

If you guys, and everybody for that matter, would stop fucking worrying what damn label we threw on the leader of the country, maybe we could meet in the middle, take a little from here and a little from there and get on the right track.

It's ridiculous that as voters we have to vote for the lesser evil instead of the greater good because some old men are too busy with their pissing contest.

politics has always been like this nothing new...always been ugly business difference now is that it doesn't end in civil war or bloodshed.
obama was supposed to be above this sorta uglyness, he ran as a uniter not a divider, and the country is more divided than ever before...first step in reconcilliation is getting him the fuk outta office, then i thikn we'll see some improvement on relations

 

[AFeedz]

politics has always been like this nothing new...always been ugly business difference now is that it doesn't end in civil war or bloodshed.
obama was supposed to be above this sorta uglyness, he ran as a uniter not a divider, and the country is more divided than ever before...first step in reconcilliation is getting him the fuk outta office, then i thikn we'll see some improvement on relations

I'm not saying politics is ever going to be rainbows and marshmallows, but our country quite clearly is focused more on their side winning than they are on working with the other side to find an answer or test a solution. It's to the point that even when someone is elected, shit doesn't and will continue to not get done because we're too busy being angry at the other side.

...and Obama didn't further divide anybody. A clear change in mindset and further division between people was already evident during the 2008 campaign season before he was even elected.

Do you really mean if Obama was out, there'd be an improvement in relations? Or do you mean as long as he was out and someone from your side was in there'd be an improvement, as opposed to Obama being out but some other Democrat being in?

Unfortunately, it really doesn't matter who the fuck takes office right now. People are so focused on the name of the party, they'd rather force whoever's in office to accomplish nothing than allow them to accomplish anything and see if it works and that goes for whoever wins in 2012, liberal or conservative.

 

[miplank]

You don't know shit

 

[binö]

I'm not saying politics is ever going to be rainbows and marshmallows, but our country quite clearly is focused more on their side winning than they are on working with the other side to find an answer or test a solution. It's to the point that even when someone is elected, shit doesn't and will continue to not get done because we're too busy being angry at the other side.

...and Obama didn't further divide anybody. A clear change in mindset and further division between people was already evident during the 2008 campaign season before he was even elected.

Do you really mean if Obama was out, there'd be an improvement in relations? Or do you mean as long as he was out and someone from your side was in there'd be an improvement, as opposed to Obama being out but some other Democrat being in? Unfortunately, it really doesn't matter who the fuck takes office right now. People are so focused on the name of the party, they'd rather force whoever's in office to accomplish nothing than allow them to accomplish anything and see if it works and that goes for whoever wins in 2012, liberal or conservative.

yes, i think a more experienced politican knows how to work with the other side...obama from the get go has been completely inept in this dept, and no wonder he never got the seasoning that comes with a lengthy policital background...like bill clinton, being a gov of a heavy GOP state, or romney, being a a gov in a heavy lib state...both have experience in working with the other side to reach a compromise and make gov work, obama clearly does not posess that skill...if a reasonable dem ran in 2016, i could def be persuaded to vote that way, esp if romney's bid doesn't work out.

 

[AFeedz]

yes, i think a more experienced politican knows how to work with the other side...obama from the get go has been completely inept in this dept, and no wonder he never got the seasoning that comes with a lengthy policital background...like bill clinton, being a gov of a heavy GOP state, or romney, being a a gov in a heavy lib state...both have experience in working with the other side to reach a compromise and make gov work, obama clearly does not posess that skill...if a reasonable dem ran in 2016, i could def be persuaded to vote that way, esp if romney's bid doesn't work out.

just checking.

good answer.