blood_drinker
New member
wtf!!!
I *COMPLETELY* agree with MS about it working in practice but not in theory. It has been my case.
And your theory isn't very solid, and just like our theory, yours has no scientific evidence. The difference between the two is that we have more "practice evidence" than your theory does. So what's it gonna be? Yours to decide. Try em both, see what works best for your body.
I think that's a solution we can all live with.
And MS, could you go into the biochemistry of
Not cackerot that Im not attempting to disrespect you. I actually respect you for doubting conventional thinking, it is what makes good scientists. But unfortunately im not on your side, that's all.
Peace
I *COMPLETELY* agree with MS about it working in practice but not in theory. It has been my case.
And your theory isn't very solid, and just like our theory, yours has no scientific evidence. The difference between the two is that we have more "practice evidence" than your theory does. So what's it gonna be? Yours to decide. Try em both, see what works best for your body.
I think that's a solution we can all live with.
And MS, could you go into the biochemistry of
Im interested, as this could be a final argument to this case. And if you have scientifc evidence of whatever you are going to say, that will shut cackerot up.breakdown of muscle as a part of muscle "remodelling" is probably one of the most important aspects of muscle growth/maintenance in the right environment. In other words, short-term catabolism can lead to long term muscle growth/maintenance if you play your cards right.
Not cackerot that Im not attempting to disrespect you. I actually respect you for doubting conventional thinking, it is what makes good scientists. But unfortunately im not on your side, that's all.
Peace