Dad wasn't dad after all, but still owes child support

[nimbus]

marriage legally binds you to the indivdual you married; not the children she may bare with random men she fucks on the side....


Where the fuck are you getting your rational from?

ya i should've said guardianship, not marriage. your analogy still sucked though

 

[jh1]

it doesn't break a legal guardian contract. i should've said that instead of marriage

So he entered a legal guardian contract?

 

[jh1]

ya i should've said guardianship, not marriage. your analogy still sucked though

Claiming he entered into some defacto guardianship agreement takes me right back to the old lady.

This guy was deceived, and helped the children - but by doing so doesn't make him any more legally liable than the guy that helps the old lady.

 

[Smurfy]

it doesn't break a legal guardian contract. i should've said that instead of marriage

i see what you're saying. any children born out of the marriage - even if they weren't biologically created by both parties - would be under the guardianship of both the husband and the wife. kind of like other property that is accrued during the marriage - regardless of who actuall PAID for it. i.e. if the woman doesnt work, she still gets 1/2 of all assets that came about during the marriage. and now the man is also responsible for any children that are born during the marriage, even if it was a result of his wife's infidelity.

i still dont like it though.

 

[nimbus]

i forgot to hit the reply button, but this was in response to jh1's post, not smurfy's


well it's not like a physical contract i don't think, but i'm pretty sure if your wife has kids while married to you, you are their legal guardians by default.

 

[nimbus]

i see what you're saying. any children born out of the marriage - even if they weren't biologically created by both parties - would be under the guardianship of both the husband and the wife. kind of like other property that is accrued during the marriage - regardless of who actuall PAID for it. i.e. if the woman doesnt work, she still gets 1/2 of all assets that came about during the marriage. and now the man is also responsible for any children that are born during the marriage, even if it was a result of his wife's infidelity.

i still dont like it though.

it's a shitty, shitty situation. and i think that the woman should be punished somehow

 

[Bikini Mod]

there is no man law in no land that could make me pay that money........I'd liquidate all of it, go to the carribean.......and dare somebody to come get me...........fuck the U.S. and it's feckless mealy mouth bullshit, I'm tired of it.

My thoughts exactly...

 

[Smurfy]

it's a shitty, shitty situation. and i think that the woman should be punished somehow

i'd be willing to volunteer for the job of punishing these bitches.

 

[nimbus]

Claiming he entered into some defacto guardianship agreement takes me right back to the old lady.

This guy was deceived, and helped the children - but by doing so doesn't make him any more legally liable than the guy that helps the old lady.

umm by default he would be the legal guardian

 

[puddlemonkey]

lol@by default