Dad wasn't dad after all, but still owes child support

[covergrl80]

This is why men go fucking nuts and kill some women!!

She should not get a damn penny. If he wants to be in the child's life then great, but to force him to pay for a child that is not his own is just insane

 

[puddlemonkey]

This is why men go fucking nuts and kill some women!!

She should not get a damn penny. If he wants to be in the child's life then great, but to force him to pay for a child that is not his own is just insane

I you

 

[samoth]

 

[nimbus]

Lock check

hahaha

 

[covergrl80]

I you

awwww

 

[Wulfgar]

is this some more "save the Children" horeshit?

 

[Spartacus]

I'm sort of feeling sorry for the father of heatherar's baby
despite what she claims
that guy is going to pay

 

[jh1]

ok so i used the wrong term for my argument. you are totally right about legal guardianship. the word i was looking for was paternity

Paternity is established by the 'father' signing the birth certificate, or a court determining paternity.

In this case, I presume the husband signed the B/C based on the fraud that the mother committed. Judges in divorce or paternity suits can / will / do / have an obligation to change the B/C to reflect the real father when the issue is raised / proven.

I don't remember the details, but I beleive this guy accepted paternity based on the FRAUD commited by this woman and a year had passed (which was his window or statute of lmitaion on disputing paternity) but only because of said fraud.

What I am debating is that there shouldn't even be a limit on the window to dispute paternity, ESPECIALLY so in the case of fraud. That's like putting a limit on someone appealing a guilty verdict when new compeling evidnce, such as DNA, would proven them innocent.

What you are saying is that paternity is / should be automatic and the biologics of it should have no weight at all - that is unless the biological father can be found - then and only then can this poor innocent schmuck be let off the financial hook.

If i was this guy and you were the judge, I'd kill you.

 

[redsamurai]

you know, I've been thinking a little bit more about this situation........and my position now is "somewhat" different after some reflection.......basically I put myself in the position of a supreme court judge and how they would rule on it.........or more like how I would rule on it if I were a supreme court judge..... So, y'all ready for some King Solomon shit right here???

Ok, my original position still stands that the father should not/cannot be forced in anyway to accept responsibility for the child.......if the kid drops into poverty, it's on his stinking whore of a mother. Ok........but here is what I would do if I was king.........because I feel that there still is "some" connection between the father and the child......I'd call both of em in and put the mother to the fire. Basically, I'd first ask the father if he'd be apt to take care of the kid if sole custody resided with him.........and I'd kind push him that direction with not so uncertain threats.......ok, I get him to agree...........than I call in the whore and ask her just how much she loves her child........I'd tell her that the child get's taken care of by your ex, but that you relinquish sole custody and see your child basically on his whim, so it may be never. This way the guy raises the kid "basically" as his own and none of his money goes to her manolo blanik and gabana fetish............if she doesn't wish to relinquish custody, fine........she raises the kid on her own and the man is absolved of all responsibility.....................all hail king alexander the great!! and i'm off to my harem!...... peace bitches!

 

[DannoMight]

I guarantee that that guy had the paternity test done as fast as he could when he found out she cheated on him and there was a possibility that the kid wasn't his. He should get visitation if he wants but shouldn't have to give that cheating bitch a dime.