Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
"Waaahhhh Im 18 and just got 162 years for committing 7 armed robberies, Waaaahhhhhh!
- Thread starter -SD-
- Start date
nimbus
New member
Re: "Waaahhhh Im 18 and just got 162 years for committing 7 armed robberies, Waaaahhh
spree killer you maybe have a chance to rehab; maybe he was on some crazy drugs or under some ridiculous stress. maybe he can rejoin society and be a positive force
serial killer there is probably something innately homicidal about them and they will almost certainly keep killing unless incarcerated.
sentencing fixes the future, not the past
spree killer you maybe have a chance to rehab; maybe he was on some crazy drugs or under some ridiculous stress. maybe he can rejoin society and be a positive force
serial killer there is probably something innately homicidal about them and they will almost certainly keep killing unless incarcerated.
sentencing fixes the future, not the past
Re: "Waaahhhh Im 18 and just got 162 years for committing 7 armed robberies, Waaaahhh
Chop off a finger for every offense. It's hard to hold a gun with three fingers.
Chop off a finger for every offense. It's hard to hold a gun with three fingers.
Re: "Waaahhhh Im 18 and just got 162 years for committing 7 armed robberies, Waaaahhh
Right, which is why I think its important that he shows remorse which is why I wondered why or if he turned down the plea deal. People can't change if they can't accept what they did was wrong and accept responsibility. Plea bargains are usually in their best interest if they're guilty. Turning one down when the evidence is overwhelmingly against him and then lying to garner sympathy makes me wonder if he's anti-social. The article was worded so weird that it made me wonder...
Right, which is why I think its important that he shows remorse which is why I wondered why or if he turned down the plea deal. People can't change if they can't accept what they did was wrong and accept responsibility. Plea bargains are usually in their best interest if they're guilty. Turning one down when the evidence is overwhelmingly against him and then lying to garner sympathy makes me wonder if he's anti-social. The article was worded so weird that it made me wonder...
Similar threads
