George Spellwin The Architect Staff member Administrator Elite Moderator Moderator Aug 23, 2005 #12 Who was it that went broke by over 1 million? Did he ever cover his bets?
N needtogetaas New member Aug 23, 2005 #13 George Spellwin said: Who was it that went broke by over 1 million? Did he ever cover his bets? Click to expand... dtbb and yes he has I think.
George Spellwin said: Who was it that went broke by over 1 million? Did he ever cover his bets? Click to expand... dtbb and yes he has I think.
newbiebynature MVP EF VIP Aug 23, 2005 #14 its always a treat when george posts...man of few words...
SoreArms New member Aug 23, 2005 #15 musclemuscle the most recent. I think you need to stop allowing bookies to wager more than they can cover. -1,000,000 used to be way beyond banable
musclemuscle the most recent. I think you need to stop allowing bookies to wager more than they can cover. -1,000,000 used to be way beyond banable
George Spellwin The Architect Staff member Administrator Elite Moderator Moderator Aug 23, 2005 #16 SoreArms said: musclemuscle the most recent. I think you need to stop allowing bookies to wager more than they can cover. -1,000,000 used to be way beyond banable Click to expand... Oh lord, musclemuscle is in the red -1,201,315 - no wonder he was not around today! He's a good bro though, so I know he will cover his loses. But what should happen to a member who goes that far red and does not cover the losses?
SoreArms said: musclemuscle the most recent. I think you need to stop allowing bookies to wager more than they can cover. -1,000,000 used to be way beyond banable Click to expand... Oh lord, musclemuscle is in the red -1,201,315 - no wonder he was not around today! He's a good bro though, so I know he will cover his loses. But what should happen to a member who goes that far red and does not cover the losses?
foreigngirl New member Aug 23, 2005 #17 George Spellwin said: Oh lord, musclemuscle is in the red -1,201,315 - no wonder he was not around today! He's a good bro though, so I know he will cover his loses. But what should happen to a member who goes that far red and does not cover the losses? Click to expand... yeah, really, what happens?
George Spellwin said: Oh lord, musclemuscle is in the red -1,201,315 - no wonder he was not around today! He's a good bro though, so I know he will cover his loses. But what should happen to a member who goes that far red and does not cover the losses? Click to expand... yeah, really, what happens?
George Spellwin The Architect Staff member Administrator Elite Moderator Moderator Aug 23, 2005 #18 Eventually, they get put in the Hall of Shame, banned from the Bookie forum, and get the huge red mark made permanent. We even had a member with a gambling issue ask us to ban him from the bookie forum. I thought that was very noble.
Eventually, they get put in the Hall of Shame, banned from the Bookie forum, and get the huge red mark made permanent. We even had a member with a gambling issue ask us to ban him from the bookie forum. I thought that was very noble.
S Sub-Zero High End Bro Platinum Aug 23, 2005 #20 George Spellwin said: Oh lord, musclemuscle is in the red -1,201,315 - no wonder he was not around today! He's a good bro though, so I know he will cover his loses. But what should happen to a member who goes that far red and does not cover the losses? Click to expand... they should lose their plat untill they pay to get back to 0
George Spellwin said: Oh lord, musclemuscle is in the red -1,201,315 - no wonder he was not around today! He's a good bro though, so I know he will cover his loses. But what should happen to a member who goes that far red and does not cover the losses? Click to expand... they should lose their plat untill they pay to get back to 0