This whole post is rife with un educated spoon fed narrative rambling. Congratulations on being able to regurgitate boiler plate narratives. Without govt regulation we'd still be sujected to massive amounts of mercury in our drinking water, which is fine we get all the mercury now that we can handle in seafood. I used to be a co owner of a business that operated in road coating materials and I can tell you unequivocably that without the EPA there would still be the nastiest of solvents, like styrenes, leaching from roads into sewage and ground water. People forget so easily and quickly what business's were getting away with in decades past and would not have stopped doing if it weren't for the govt tellin em to stop coating the populace with carcinogens. Sorry but the free market woudln't have handled that one.
Congratulations, you unequivocally do not know how to read nor do you know how to do a critical post review. I said, "the EPA should make minimal decisions." The point is the EPA gives the environmentalists too much ammo with their bogus "environment scares." Leading, to entirely too much litigation and hindering us from digging for our own evergy. The EPA is a good organization for some of the reasons you stated, but that is all.