Why the GOP must be stopped

[redsamurai]

^^^ this.

Bubba got hummers and played with cigars while Al Quada armed themselves.

idiot al quida was arming themselves in the 80's in afghanistan. And that was an easy one. That's like a second level question in who wants to be a millionaire and you used up all your lifelines already. mrplunkey=fucked

 

[redsamurai]

I miss RS

hi sweetie

 

[redsamurai]

Oh rest assured, I don't know if you do or not. I am basing my reply on your immediate statement that you favor Obama's "track record" of killing a bunch of Stone Age tribesmen. I'm not sure what you mean by if we're wasting taxpayer dollars then we need to kill people. Could you please clarify who it is that we should be killing? If it's the politicians, then I can get behind that.

But let's get back to Obama's track record of killing Taliban. To what end? If you don't feel we should have gone there initially (which I feel as well), then why get behind a POTUS that is still there...for what?

I'll tell you what...This POTUS is using the American men and women in uniform to protect corporate interests abroad...period. This POTUS, in conjunction with the media and corporate interests, is feeding the populace "propaganda" to make us "believe" we are overseas in the name of national security....right. Meanwhile, we have an open border between us and Mexico.

I said it earlier and I feel it bears repeating; The largest copper mine in the world now resides in Afghanistan. China has exclusive rights to it. China provides the workers (Chinese nationals) while the US military provides the "security". Why? Well let's play it out to "End Game", shall we? The US provides the security for the extraction and processing of the ore. Said ore is shipped off to China for refinement that eventually ends up in the circuit board of our iPhones and iPads. The American consumer wins...at the expense of corporate interests paid in the blood of a few young American men and women.

ur a bombastic old coot but you're not wrong on this right here.

 

[simply dave]

ur a bombastic old coot but you're not wrong on this right here.

I may tend to "wax verbose" on many occasion, so I won't argue that. And yes...I am an "Old Coot"...But I make a point of staying informed. I will take this as a compliment. **wink**

 

[simply dave]

ur a bombastic old coot but you're not wrong on this right here.

Oh...Would it be preferable if I were to respond to someone with..

"You need to STFU"...That seems to be the general "mindset" around here, yes? Just resond with a "STFU" and be accepted as opposed to presenting a "cogent" (I can say that without being bombastic, can I? Is that allowed? LOL) argument that contain multisyllabic words. Perhaps a crayon font should be an option? Forgive me, but I thought we were discussing issues amongst adults.

Fuck it...Yo RS...FUCK YOU! BLOW ME!

(There...**wink**)

 

[Mr. dB]

Ah...OK...Then I will cut you no slack. Shame on you for not knowing. You shouldn't be debating politics if you don't even know the differences between the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches. IMO you shouldn't even be voting if you don't know such fundamental operations of the Federal government. Let me guess....you went went to public school, yes?

No point in denying it, I was just out to lunch on this one.

 

[Mr. dB]

Most daves are smart Ive found

Thank you.

 

[simply dave]

No point in denying it, I was just out to lunch on this one.

Fair enough my friend. I look forward to many "informed" debates with you. My best to you.

 

[redsamurai]

no it would not be preferably, at least not to me...here's why.

A) I was complimenting you
B) I'm not a monkey

You seem to have already caught on that this place is akin to the primate enclosure at the zoo.....you drop in here come prepared with a bucket of your own feces to wing at people. It would actually be nice if there were more grownups here. But still....always have a log chambered and primed, socrates couldn't give you more sage advice.

RS>socrates ????








i'm starting that rumor.

Oh...Would it be preferable if I were to respond to someone with..

"You need to STFU"...That seems to be the general "mindset" around here, yes? Just resond with a "STFU" and be accepted as opposed to presenting a "cogent" (I can say that without being bombastic, can I? Is that allowed? LOL) argument that contain multisyllabic words. Perhaps a crayon font should be an option? Forgive me, but I thought we were discussing issues amongst adults.

Fuck it...Yo RS...FUCK YOU! BLOW ME!

(There...**wink**)

 

[simply dave]

no it would not be preferably, at least not to me...here's why.

A) I was complimenting you
B) I'm not a monkey

You seem to have already caught on that this place is akin to the primate enclosure at the zoo.....you drop in here come prepared with a bucket of your own feces to wing at people. It would actually be nice if there were more grownups here. But still....always have a log chambered and primed, socrates couldn't give you more sage advice.

RS>socrates ????






i'm starting that rumor.

And I did take it as a compliment RS. I was just trying to add a little bit more levity to the discussion. I may have fallen short as I really didn't mean what I just said. Yeah, it took me a bit to get the unique humor in this place, I'll say that much. Being the old guy that I am, I sometimes don't catch on that quickly...LOL. Oh...and by the way...I'm aspiring to attain "curmudgeon" status one day. **wink**