On the former, I don't think he had a choice. After getting stiffed by Europe when we failed to generate a consensus coalition for the Iraq operation, we'd be hypocrites if we failed to support our allies France and Italy in their attempt to stabilize Libya.
He's the commander in chief of the military. We have troops and equipment deployed in that theater. He had a choice. I don't think even you believe that "failed to support our allies" spin.
On the second, I don't see what that has to do with Presidential policy.
Did you miss this comment?
" • Companies remain reluctant to spend the $1.9 trillion in cash they’ve accumulated, especially in the United States, which would create jobs. They’re unconvinced that consumers are ready to spend again with the vigor they showed before the recession,
and they are worried about uncertainty in U.S. government policies. "
There are dozens of sources attributing the unprecedented amount of money sitting on the sidelines due to uncertainty in U.S. government policies. To be specific:
1) Uncertainty over tax policies. Barry just loves giving that "fair share" talk, which makes companies hoard cash.
2) Uncertainty over health care law. Like Nancy said, "we have to pass it so we can see what's in it." We still don't know what's in it.
3) Uncertainty over labor relations. Barry's NLRB is basically making things up as they go. It's a very business-hostile administration. And I'm pretty sure Boeing agrees with me.
4) Uncertainty over energy policy.
5) Uncertainty over financial regulation.
6) Uncertainty over which industry gets declared the next villain.
and the list goes on and on... All these factors result in money being sidelined or moved outside of the US, which translates into jobs moving with them.